Started By
Message
and you support anarchy and voted for both clintons
1
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:41 am to Tillman
quote:
if they were at this chemical weapons depot, why are you concerned about them being killed?
Now it is a chemical weapons depot? Fox told me it was an airfield.its concerning because theyre one of maybe two militaries that could possibly go toe to toe with us.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:42 am to BoddaBoom7
ok, that makes no sense.
i oppose countries using chemical weapons in warfare.
i oppose countries using chemical weapons in warfare.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:45 am to Tillman
quote:
ok, that makes no sense.
About as much sense as your baseless comments calling me a leftwing kook and makinh excuses for russia.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:46 am to Tillman
quote:
i oppose countries using chemical weapons in warfare
Good for you. Welcome to the civilized world
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:47 am to BoddaBoom7
then why do you get all worked up about strikes on this airfield.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:49 am to Tillman
Holy shite man. Because I don't think its a good idea to provoke Russia. If no Russian troops end up dead, hey, good job. But if they did, you can restassured it wont go unnoticed by Putin
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:51 am to BoddaBoom7
ok you a Russia brown noser for sure.
i am sympathetic to arguments that we should stay out of Syria b/c it is not a national security interest for the USA. but not to the argument we shouldn't b/c Russia won't like it. that seems like coward foreign policy to me. russia not king of the world.
i am sympathetic to arguments that we should stay out of Syria b/c it is not a national security interest for the USA. but not to the argument we shouldn't b/c Russia won't like it. that seems like coward foreign policy to me. russia not king of the world.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:51 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:54 am to Tillman
Russia is king of Trump tho
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:55 am to CNB
i think that talking point just bit the dust, leftwing dbag.
how can he do a strike on a Syrian airfield and be Putin's poodle at same time.
how can he do a strike on a Syrian airfield and be Putin's poodle at same time.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 12:56 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:56 am to Tillman
Well it isnt in our national security interests. That is first and foremost (see we can agree on something 
). As far as cowardly foreign policy , its called diplomacy.
Say there was a rebel uprising in Saudi Arabia. We send our jets and bombers over there since we are allies and wanna help em out. Then say China started backing the rebels with weapons and support for years. Then all of a sudden they started firing cruise missles at us. You wouldn't consider that an unnecessary escalation?
). As far as cowardly foreign policy , its called diplomacy. Say there was a rebel uprising in Saudi Arabia. We send our jets and bombers over there since we are allies and wanna help em out. Then say China started backing the rebels with weapons and support for years. Then all of a sudden they started firing cruise missles at us. You wouldn't consider that an unnecessary escalation?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:57 am to BoddaBoom7
i don't think any action in Syria can be rationally viewed as an act of war with Russia.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:57 am to Tillman
quote:
russia not king of the world.
We are?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:58 am to BoddaBoom7
quote:
We are?
you are suggesting that we not do something simply b/c Russia won't like it. i don't think that is a rational foreign policy approach.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 1:00 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 12:59 am to Tillman
quote:
don't think any action in Syria can be rationally viewed as an act of war with Russia.
What? You realize thats how so many nations were sucked into ww1 right? Countries have treaties that say if you are atacked, we got your back.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 1:00 am to BoddaBoom7
ok well your paranoia doesn't mean Russia about to declare war on US. let's cross that bridge when we get there.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 1:00 am to BoddaBoom7
ok well your paranoia doesn't mean Russia about to declare war on US. let's cross that bridge when we get there.
there is no evidence that Russia is that suicidal and going to war with USA is suicidal for Russia. lol
there is no evidence that Russia is that suicidal and going to war with USA is suicidal for Russia. lol
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 1:01 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 1:00 am to Tillman
quote:
we should do things because they are either right and/or in the interest of the USA.
You just said we have no interests in syria.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 1:01 am to BoddaBoom7
i didn't say that.
i said i'm sympathetic to the argument.
preventing the use of chemical weapons in warfare is a worthy goal for the US. that doesn't mean we always want to be the one to do a strike as Trump did in SYria.
i said i'm sympathetic to the argument.
preventing the use of chemical weapons in warfare is a worthy goal for the US. that doesn't mean we always want to be the one to do a strike as Trump did in SYria.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 1:02 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 1:01 am to Tillman
quote:
how can he do a strike on a Syrian airfield and be Putin's poodle at same time.
You know we called Russia and told them we were doing it and coordinated to not anywhere Russian troops were stationed, right?
Probably not.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News