Started By
Message

re: The importance of student debt to the consumerist economy

Posted on 9/4/15 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Tuition increases have been far greater than he amount of scholarships available to most aspiring students. This has been proven. Institutions have made it virtually impossible to attend college, undergrad or grad, without having to attain loans, unless you are upper middle class or upper class. These are facts at this point that I don't feel obligated to provide proof. It's become common sense.


The increase cost of tuition is directly correlated to the demand put on higher education by the abundance of financial aid given and high paying jobs requiring masters degrees. If I could do it all over again, I would have gone to the Marines and took advantage of the G.I. Bill.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

The stupidity of this statement is just astounding. People should do whatever they need to do to get where they want.
Do you realize that taking on massive amounts of debts hinders the next generation from growth and prosper? It creates a cycle that is hard to be broken. If I have to continually pay my debts, then I can't put back for my daughter's education. Then she will have to take out debt and so forth.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20471 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

If I have to continually pay my debts, then I can't put back for my daughter's education.


That's the entire point of my statement. If you can't pay your debt, then you shouldn't be borrowing the money. Ultimately it has done you zero good.

Get a job to pay for school, or borrow money only if it can be paid off quickly after graduation.

We've created an entire generation of dumbasses with $60k in debt and nothing to show for it except for a general business degree that pays squat.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118904 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Student loans have become the student equivalent to welfare. People use them because its easy not because they don't have other options. Hell half the people that take out loans just get them so they'll have money to blow.


I agree with this. There is no requirement to go into debt to get thru school. I didn't and lots of other people don't either.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33328 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:38 pm to
School was a lot cheaper back when you went.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
13866 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:40 pm to
The problem with student loans is that too many people take out $100K in loans to attend Vanderbilt to be a social worker knowing damn well that it doesn't pay worth a shite. Students get fixated on a particular school and don't look at value. I have a friend with a Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice. He could've obtained the same degree from Sam Houston State for a third the price.....and SHSU is actually a better C.J. school.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28814 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

. I didn't and lots of other people don't either.




No you didn't.

And even if you did go through school without debt, cas4t and ST think that our story doesn't apply and it's irrelevant. truth be damned.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35606 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 1:45 pm to
It's becoming more difficult every year as tuition outpaces inflation. It's a reinforcing cycle too. More kids take out loans to pay for the more expensive school which allows schools to keep raising tuition.

It's great that you hard working folks got your degree in 4-5 years working full time and getting a 4.0 in engineering. It doesn't make that the ideal way to go about the continuing education our population needs in the 21st century. More direct state funding would be a nice statrt. Kids being more mindful of what they are using their loans to pay for is another important piece.

Higher Ed needs some rebalancing of the payment structure to better serve the needs of the country. While there's certainly merit in the idea not everyone should take out huge loans for worthless degrees, I'm not buying the no loans method as a realistic answer.
Posted by Russvegas Dan
Member since Nov 2012
1180 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

cas4t and ST think that our story doesn't apply and it's irrelevant.


Your story IS irrelevant because your numbers no longer apply. That same exact situation now (minimum wage paying for a few years) that you struggled to get through would be even harder. You guys cant see this?
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
10325 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 3:15 pm to
There's some interesting material here. But the fact that you are the President of tRant Tinfoil Hat Club obscures your message.

Newsflash: there's no conspiracy here. You make an investment in your education to the extent that you feel it will pay off for you. And to the extent that you can afford it, either now or later when you make the payments. Student debt is --- like most everything else --- not nearly the complex issue that you have twisted it around to be.

Go get a life.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

That's the entire point of my statement. If you can't pay your debt, then you shouldn't be borrowing the money. Ultimately it has done you zero good.

Get a job to pay for school, or borrow money only if it can be paid off quickly after graduation.

We've created an entire generation of dumbasses with $60k in debt and nothing to show for it except for a general business degree that pays squat.



I don't think you realize how much the economic landscape has change in the past ten years. There aren't a lot, if any, entry level jobs that require a high school diploma that will also allow you the time to take classes. I think that people without a lot of money should definitely look at going the juco route for the first two years. It will cut the cost a good bit.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28814 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Your story IS irrelevant because your numbers no longer apply. That same exact situation now (minimum wage paying for a few years) that you struggled to get through would be even harder. You guys cant see this?


I can see this, but it doesn't mean our story doesn't apply. I did it making $5.15. You're telling me that NOBODY is getting through school @ $7.25 today without a student loan? Literally nobody? Not one person?
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35606 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:22 pm to
Do you know how much tuition and housing is at your average state school?

It's not impossible, but you're adding on an extra couple of semesters at the least. That also costs the earning potential of working and starting a career. You might have no debt but you're likely starting later and paid more for your degree. You're paying the price either way imho.

You know I respect your path, but you need to approach the problem on a broader scale.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28814 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:30 pm to
I hear you and appreciate that.

I'm not saying universities or state's shouldn't do something to cut costs. Something's broken there.

Honestly, Obama's announcement to subsidize community college at tax payers expense wasn't my least favorite thing he's ever done. Getting people into trades is vastly underrated and if people go that route we have a lot more middle class people, instead of people in poverty, with a penchant for crime.


But..... I don't think that blaming loans is the issue. There's a lot of blame no doubt. But loans and loaners are not the problem. And I don't think me paying more taxes for your kid's school is the answer either.
Posted by Russvegas Dan
Member since Nov 2012
1180 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:44 pm to
Is one person enough?
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

If you can't pay your debt, then you shouldn't be borrowing the money. Ultimately it has done you zero good.



I mean that sounds idealistic, but how many 18 years old have you met with that much foresight? I have met exactly zero. Society has drilled it into kids' heads for 20 years now that they have to go to college to be successful, and that couldn't be further from the truth. Then you have college recruiters that flat out lie to these high school students about their job prospects upon graduation.
Posted by Russvegas Dan
Member since Nov 2012
1180 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Honestly, Obama's announcement to subsidize community college at tax payers expense wasn't my least favorite thing he's ever done. Getting people into trades is vastly underrated and if people go that route we have a lot more middle class people, instead of people in poverty, with a penchant for crime.


I really wish this aspect of his presidency got more attention.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35606 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I don't think that blaming loans is the issue. There's a lot of blame no doubt. But loans and loaners are not the problem.


It's part of the problem. Schools build resort like amenities because the 18 year old who's making the decision wants that stuff. You mean I get that money now and pay later?

My 18 year old self likes the thought of that, even understanding how debt works. Why? Teenagers are stupid.

quote:

I don't think me paying more taxes for your kid's school is the answer either.


It's part of it, but ideally you'd take some waste out of the budget to put it into something productive like educating people in the information age.

The Obama 2 yr school proposal is another piece that can help. Makes that 4 yr school into a 2 year school. Less tuition for the student to take loans out for. Less debt on young people. Yay!

It's a start at least.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 5:57 pm to
For you guys debating between prices/wages then and now, it really doesn't matter. Yeah, there's a relative debate to be had with that, but as far as the point attempted with the meme it's mostly irrelevant that a person is able to work really hard and pay for school, or go to a cheaper school, or whatever variables result in no debt.

Without being a dick, you're missing the entire point if you think a debt-free success story has any relevance.

We're looking at the WHOLE. The entire picture.

If you're an awesome-super person that was able to go to school while working to pay for it, great. But you're an outliner.

In general, for the average situation, debt, and lots of it must be taken on to get a quality college education.

-----

I think the point of the meme is to see the impact of debt and indoctrination on young people and how that translates to a population of adults who are financially pressured into participating in a consumerist economy, as well as mentally trained to do so without questioning it -- and if they do end up still questioning, they're likely so committed with work, commute, everyday responsibilities to self educate and give real time to questioning society.

More things to be said.

But life.
This post was edited on 9/4/15 at 6:10 pm
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 9/4/15 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

We're looking at the WHOLE. The entire picture.


And yet not 1 person on here responded to my question in BOLD above.

Answer that question and you have focused the discussion where it needs to be focused.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter