Started By
Message
Should The USA Bring Back Internment Camps?
Posted on 6/12/16 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 6/12/16 at 10:03 pm
Is it time again? We are at war. and have been for over a decade. The attacks are coming to our home soil, just like Pearl Harbor. The enemy's agenda is to wipe us off the map. If we aren't going to turn their ground into glass, then this might be the next best option. Could the camps really make anything worse than they are? The
"non-radical" muslims really don't seem to be rising up against the radical ones.
Plus, there's a precedent.
"non-radical" muslims really don't seem to be rising up against the radical ones.
Plus, there's a precedent.
quote:.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the deportation and incarceration with Executive Order 9066, issued February 19, 1942, which allowed regional military commanders to designate "military areas" from which "any or all persons may be excluded." This power was used to declare that all people of Japanese ancestry were excluded from the entire West Coast, including all of California and much of Oregon, Washington and Arizona, except for those in government camps.Approximately 5,000 Japanese Americans voluntarily relocated outside the exclusion zone before March 1942, and some 5,500 community leaders arrested after the Pearl Harbor attack were already in custody. But, the majority of nearly 130,000 mainland Japanese Americans were forcibly relocated from their West Coast homes during the spring of 1942.
The War Relocation Authority (WRA) was the U.S. civilian agency responsible for the relocation and detention. The WRA was created by President Roosevelt on March 18, 1942 with Executive Order 9102 and officially ceased to exist June 30, 1946
Posted on 6/12/16 at 10:10 pm to CockInYourEar
No. It's no secret how I feel about Islam, but the answer is no.
Posted on 6/12/16 at 10:33 pm to CockInYourEar
No.
Delete your thread. For your own sake.
Delete your thread. For your own sake.
Posted on 6/12/16 at 10:33 pm to CockInYourEar
Are we talking just Muslims or all Middle Eastern people?
How far down the line are descendants going to be locked up?
Asking for a friend (totally not me) who had one grandparent who was a Christian immigrant from a formerly Christian (still high percentage, but no longer majority Christian) nation in the Middle East that does not want to end up locked in an Interment camp with a bunch of Muslims.
How far down the line are descendants going to be locked up?
Asking for a friend (totally not me) who had one grandparent who was a Christian immigrant from a formerly Christian (still high percentage, but no longer majority Christian) nation in the Middle East that does not want to end up locked in an Interment camp with a bunch of Muslims.
Posted on 6/12/16 at 11:08 pm to pvilleguru
Is this the type of shite they are proposing on the poli board?
Posted on 6/12/16 at 11:36 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
"non-radical" muslims really don't seem to be rising up against the radical ones.
Posted on 6/13/16 at 12:48 am to CockInYourEar
I have this idea to solve the problem and we've used it before...
was it a Democrat's idea?
Yes sir
then frick that shite
was it a Democrat's idea?
Yes sir
then frick that shite
Posted on 6/13/16 at 3:41 pm to CockInYourEar
Yes. For extremist Muslims and street gang members.
Posted on 6/13/16 at 4:02 pm to Vols&Shaft83
shafty taking up for muslims. I thought i would never see this
Posted on 6/13/16 at 4:04 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
shafty taking up for muslims. I thought i would never see this
I ain't taking up for shite, don't make me throw a brick at you, motherfricker
Posted on 6/13/16 at 4:14 pm to CockInYourEar
No but Muslims who army citizens should be sent back to their home country immediately.
Posted on 6/13/16 at 4:17 pm to Vols&Shaft83
saying no is like saying dirka dirka bricks to the infidels
Posted on 6/13/16 at 4:21 pm to heartbreakTiger
I gotta be really careful right now, apparently I'm getting RA'd, A LOT, lately.
Posted on 6/13/16 at 4:33 pm to heartbreakTiger
That has to be it. I really haven't gone HAM on anyone else lately.
Posted on 6/13/16 at 4:45 pm to CockInYourEar
We have an internment camp. its called Guantanamo bay.
Posted on 6/13/16 at 6:33 pm to Bama Eric
quote:
For extremist Muslims
You can't do it for all Muslims. Should be vs. terrorists only (regardless of religion/ethnic group/country of origin).
Anybody advocating terrorism or allegiance to a known terror group (like what the Orlando shooter did) needs to be detained and held by the FBI and at minimum deported. They should be detained until it's decided whether the threat is credible or not.
If it's just 1st Amendment political dissent and not a real threat they should be let go or not detained in the first place.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:21 am to WiscyTiger
quote:
Anybody advocating terrorism or allegiance to a known terror group (like what the Orlando shooter did) needs to be detained and held by the FBI and at minimum deported
Lol what do you suppose we do with the Aryan Nation guys? They're a registered domestic terrorism orginization. You can't deport Americans. You couldn't deport Mateen. He's an American citizen. It's not illegal to be a kkk member so it's not illegal to be a supporter of radical Islam. You have to actually commit a hate crime/terrorist act to be a criminal for those beliefs. Free speech man, you can't ban that. No matter how messed up someone's beliefs are, you have to at least wait for a planned conspiracy at minimum before you can legally detain and arrest them. They should be monitored heavily though.
quote:
If it's just 1st Amendment political dissent and not a real threat they should be let go or not detained in the first place.
What's your definition of a "real threat"? Saying "I want to kill Jews and black people" isn't considered a real conspiracy. Neither is " I want to kill gay or Christian Americans"
This post was edited on 6/14/16 at 9:25 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News