Started By
Message

OTB Poll Question: Do you support Unions?

Posted on 6/10/15 at 7:37 pm
Posted by Stir of Echoes
SD, LA, OC, and the Inland Empire.
Member since Feb 2015
1052 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 7:37 pm
Why or why not?

I support, and am a member of a Union within the federal government.

I know some of you probably abhore that idea, and that's ok.

Let's talk about Unions, public and private.

Posted by Chazzy McRamzee
Member since Jun 2014
2681 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 7:41 pm to
Unions cause more problems. Less money in your pocket.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:02 pm to
The 20th century model of unions was great for the 19th and 20th century, but doesn't work in the era of modern global commerce for one reason: unions are a monopoly like any other. Their commodity is labor. Once you grasp this concept, the idea of protected, single, monolithic unions in America seems silly.

When you have a monopoly on labor and can set your price, you're fine. But with an integrated global economy, monopolies must learn to compete. Union labor competes with labor overseas, and they lose every time because they don't even try to compete in the marketplace, they just try to make the competition illegal.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63849 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:09 pm to
I support the idea of unions, just not modern day unions in practice.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:09 pm to
I support free association but I don't support those associations using government power to get their demands.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:14 pm to
Yes to true unions that were needed between the Civil War and World War II to combat the robber barons. Between the 50's and 70's They had become as bloated as the folks they were intended to fight against. In the post Reagan era where consolidation has created a new era of robber barons in the past decade they probably need to reappear again, but controlled by the workers and not the other way around.

Perhaps the ownership of Houchens Industries may be the better model. The founders heirs own a small share of the company and the employees own the rest. No Wall Street folks to manipulate the stock price or drain current revenue at the expense of long term financial planning. Since the workers own part of the company, it eliminates the need for unions. Basically it eliminates unneeded middlemen on both sides and passes the savings on to the company and workers at the same time.
Posted by Stir of Echoes
SD, LA, OC, and the Inland Empire.
Member since Feb 2015
1052 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:16 pm to
I don't disagree with anything you said, except the part about making competition illegal.

Unions have set standards, it's not that they want to make competition illegal, they just refuse to budge from their standards.

It's a standard that is important for earning a living wage in America.

Companies aren't evil, companies aren't looking to squeeze out the American worker. Greed is evil, shareholders are evil. These are the dominant forces in the decline of the American workforce.

Unions have done their part in shipping jobs overseas, but it's only because they won't bow down to the evils within the corporate structures.

ETA my iPad sucks after this iOS 8 "upgrade".





This post was edited on 6/10/15 at 8:18 pm
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Greed is evil


Greed is the reason you're typing on a computer.
Posted by Stir of Echoes
SD, LA, OC, and the Inland Empire.
Member since Feb 2015
1052 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Greed is the reason you're typing on a computer.


Genius is the reason I'm typing on an iPad.

Greed is why it's built in China.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:22 pm to
Genius means nothing without the incentive to profit from one's work. Other than a few genuine crypto-types who make open source (who are well off anyway), there is no reason to put effort into something without getting a return.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Companies aren't evil, companies aren't looking to squeeze out the American worker.


We can agree to disagree on this

quote:

Greed is evil, shareholders are evil.


These statements are not the same, you realize this?

Greed is evil in the sense it places the power to the "I" instead of the "we". In the past we took photos of our friends and family to remember them after they had passed. We now take pictures of ourselves. This is a simple shift of "we" thinking to "I" thinking.

As for shareholders you need to better define this concept. In the past the shareholders were owner / creators of a business and the workers who bought shares to grow the company (and their retirement at a later date). Now those same corporations are held by managers of mutual funds and tip top executives getting their shares for free via options where they never take possession and must have their own skin in the game for several decades. Revenue going to a few at the top as excessive bonuses if not the same as small sums entering hundreds of thousands of current and former employees is a much more efficient way to spread the wealth back into the system.

In addition you create an empire through savings instead of a declining country swallowed in growing debt.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Genius is the reason I'm typing on an iPad.

Greed is why it's built in China.


Well played!
*golf clap*
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

"I" instead of the "we"


When does 'we' end? Your friends and family? Your neighborhood? Your city? Your county? Your state? Your nation?
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

When does 'we' end?


It does not end, as it is a state of mind not bound by a line on a map

Maybe the better way to view it is layers of an onion.

The core is your family, surrounded by your friends, surrounded by your neighborhood, surrounded by your community, and on and on until you get to the whole damn globe.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:41 pm to
Yeah, I'm not buying that. I associate with people I like. No more, no less. Do I have sympathy for those outside the in-group? Yes. I have no moral obligation to them, however, except to not harm them.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:44 pm to
no
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I'm not buying that.


Which is probably why you are 30 or younger

quote:

I associate with people I like. No more, no less.


Which means you are an "I" not a "we"and you are more of the problem than the solution.

quote:

I have no moral obligation to them, however, except to not harm them.


Depends on how you define harm. Sometimes those doing the most harm are the ones who drop out and do nothing.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Which is probably why you are 30 or younger



Just by a year or two, yes.

quote:

Which means you are an "I" not a "we"and you are more of the problem than the solution.


Cool story. I'm sure you hang out with people you dislike and disdain on a daily basis. What a saint.

quote:

Depends on how you define harm. Sometimes those doing the most harm are the ones who drop out and do nothing.


Inaction, except in negligence of a certain strain, has no moral effect.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

I'm sure you hang out with people you dislike and disdain on a daily basis.


I don't really dislike anybody. Sure not every interaction in the day is sunshine and unicorns but having seen the best and worst in many people over a span of time that well exceeds yours I have learned to accept and get along than to segregate and eliminate that is which makes up the whole sphere of living.

Oddly, when I was closer to the age you are now I was much the opposite of what I have become. My bank account may be smaller but my life experiences have been magnified far in excess to compensate for it. In short, I have become my grandfather, or at least the man he was when I was closer to your age. life is funny that way.
Posted by Stir of Echoes
SD, LA, OC, and the Inland Empire.
Member since Feb 2015
1052 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 9:03 pm to
In post war America "We" meant a lot more than it does now. (Capitalized for emphasis.)

I don't think "I" is what you were looking for there Grits, it should probably be "me". (Lower case for emphasis.)

For what it's worth, it's a me society now.

Like it or not Unions are We. A brotherhood, a united group.

Sure, you have no moral obligation to anyone except yourself, but a united American working force is better for the whole of America.

If a company chooses to ship it's labor to China because it's cheap, so be it.

It's ironic that the same people that line the pockets of the American conservative base via PAC's, are the same people that ship jobs overseas to a communist country.

At the same time spending money to tell us all that we're on the path to a socialist left wing communist dictatorship.

There's a rich irony to the "me" America.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter