Started By
Message
NASA Allegedly Conducts More Successful Tests On "Impossible" EM Drive
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:32 pm
It's magic.
8
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:37 pm to finestfirst79
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:11 pm to finestfirst79
exception to the rule - mind blown
Posted on 11/3/15 at 11:09 pm to finestfirst79
Glenn Research Centre
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Those are some heavy duty institutions that will do the peer reviews.
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Those are some heavy duty institutions that will do the peer reviews.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 11:58 pm to finestfirst79
quote:
Tests On "Impossible" EM Drive
that anything like a power stroke
Posted on 11/4/15 at 5:12 am to finestfirst79
Not sure why NASA just does not make a nuke powered ship and go where ever they want
This post was edited on 11/4/15 at 5:20 am
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:03 am to finestfirst79
It is just a distraction to keep the masses ignorant. This technology is useless. The good stuff that has been around for decades will come out soon enough.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:46 am to LanierSpots
quote:Construct the power source on earth or assemble it in space? Either way we have to strap nuclear material into a rocket that always has a chance to blow up in the atmosphere. That's probably as risk they don't want to take.
Not sure why NASA just does not make a nuke powered ship and go where ever they want
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:50 am to finestfirst79
I'm starting to wonder why no one has made a much more powerful one. It would eliminate the question about testing irregularities since the versions now being tested are producing micro-newtons of thrust. Why not up the power and build one capable of a newton?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:44 am to cokebottleag
quote:
I'm starting to wonder why no one has made a much more powerful one. It would eliminate the question about testing irregularities since the versions now being tested are producing micro-newtons of thrust. Why not up the power and build one capable of a newton?
Because it's easier to control the outside variables on a smaller scale? They are basically playing the process of elimination.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:53 am to finestfirst79
quote:
The supposed thrust is small, on the order of the micronewton (the weight of a mosquito on Earth), so unaccounted phenomena could be mimicking thrust.
My farts can move full grown humans. Not impressed.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 5:09 pm to DownSouthJukin
Why aren't they working hard to fabricate more global warming data? Doesn't NASA know what its job is?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News