Started By
Message

re: Kentucky doctor drug off overbooked plane by force in Chicago : 5th UPDATE

Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:51 am to
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 11:51 am to
quote:

No, they wont. Almost the entire profit of airlines is in those few seats. Congress isn't going to touch that.


I doubt Congress acts (even though they should), but this argument doesn't work.

If overbooking became illegal, the airlines would just slightly increase the cost of all the seats to cover the chance that a few went unsold. No profit would be lost.

If the airlines had any sense, they'd be leading the parade to make the practice illegal. It would eliminate a customer service nightmare for them without creating a competitive disadvantage.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54613 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Almost the entire profit of airlines is in those few seats.


If you really dig, you may be incorrect. 30 years ago folks in first class paid the bulk, however, speaking to folks in first class these days, they are middle to lower management or sales reps getting bumped up with billions and billions (say it in the Carl Sagan voice) of priority points. Spoke to one drug rep who flies first class all the time with such points, has not paid for a ticket in ages.

FWIW, drinking in airport bars give great insight on how to travel well for little cash.

quote:

From gate to gate, through rentals and security?


It was a crew, they do not have to go gate to gate, rentals, and similar security. It is interesting as top flight folks travel on the jump seat so what type of crew was this? Stewardess, gate people, or some lower priority staff?

United puts crew on a puddle jumper rental and transports them across the tarmac in 15 mins or so.

United puts crew in an airport limo and drives them to LOU in about 5 hours (straight to employee gate)

I highly doubt 6 or 7

The easiest issue is upping the "buy out" to 1,200 or 1,600 dollars especially as the current rules state 400% on 1 way fare with a maximum of 1,300 dollars. Adding 400 dollars to the buyout price was way cheaper than 2 to 4 hours of flight delay and massive PR dollars lost.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54613 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:07 pm to
Sweet Baby Jesus!

quote:




Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 1:17 pm to
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 1:30 pm to
Please tell me this is real!
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 1:35 pm to
the airline claims they offered up to 1000 dollars for passengers to get off. hard to believe nobody would go for that.

but then again, if a person books a flight, he typically has somewhere he needs to be.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 1:37 pm
Posted by Tillman
Member since May 2016
12363 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 1:42 pm to
United Airlines loses $900 million in market value as shares tumble

oy
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20465 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

If the airlines had any sense, they'd be leading the parade to make the practice illegal. It would eliminate a customer service nightmare for them without creating a competitive disadvantage.


No they wouldn't. Involuntary rebooking affects .007% of passengers. Virtually every rebooking is done voluntarily based on the offer of travel vouchers.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

they were using to transport THEIR OWN PEOPLE.


When aircraft are delayed the crew meant to fly can end up outside of crew rest. Or if a plane is stuck in Florida that was supposed to be in Louisville suddenly there is nobody there to fly the plane that has a bunch of people on it because they are stuck in Florida. I don't know the specifics of what happened here but is that one guy's convenience worthe the cascading impacts of not having crew's in the right place?
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95865 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 2:13 pm to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20465 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

If you really dig, you may be incorrect. 30 years ago folks in first class paid the bulk, however, speaking to folks in first class these days, they are middle to lower management or sales reps getting bumped up with billions and billions (say it in the Carl Sagan voice) of priority points. Spoke to one drug rep who flies first class all the time with such points, has not paid for a ticket in ages.


I'm well aware of status and points. I was a points whore with 25-30 weeks of air travel per year for well over a decade. I've never bought a first class ticket, but have sat in the first class cabin often.

Regardless, I was referring to the overbooked seats, not the first class ones. The industry is on pace to set a record profit margin of about 5% this year, and that's based on extremely low fuel costs. Typical margins are razor thin, and depend heavily on filling the seats of no-shows. That's why overbooking isn't going anywhere.

quote:

It was a crew, they do not have to go gate to gate, rentals, and similar security.


They do have to walk from gate to gate, and even a limo must pick them up in designated zones outside the airport. O'hare is not a small airport. In almost every airport, they enter through the same security checkpoint as you do (even though they don't have the same screening), and ride the same transportation between terminals.

It's a five hour drive, not including any travel delays through downtown Chicago, downtown Indy, and downtown Louisville. And it counts against union and FAA allowed flight time.

quote:

Stewardess, gate people, or some lower priority staff?



It was a flight crew. It doesn't really matter if it was FA's or pilots, the FAA will not allow a plane to take off without either on board. They all had to get there, or the next flight wasn't going to go anywhere. It also doesn't matter if they were from another airline. Reciprocal agreements require you to handle the partner airline employees just as you would your own. It's good for the industry AND the customers.

I know everybody wants this to be simple, but it's not. It's a very complex, heavily regulated system, that is underappreciated by it's users. Involuntary removal is a remarkably rare occurrence.

Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118867 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

he airline claims they offered up to 1000 dollars for passengers to get off. hard to believe nobody would go for that.


I heard 800 on the news, but their next move should have been $1000, $1200, $1500 and they would have emptied all the seats they needed.

And again, they should have rented a van and drove the flight crew to Louisville. Idiots run these airlines I guess.

Will cost them millions in business for a few weeks to do something that might have cost them $300.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20465 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

their next move should have been $1000, $1200, $1500 and they would have emptied all the seats they needed.


This is correct.

quote:

And again, they should have rented a van and drove the flight crew to Louisville.


This is not correct. If they drive them, that's not considered rest time by the FAA, so you burn the shift you were taking them to Louisville for.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 7:15 pm
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29644 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 6:14 pm to
this whole thing is horrible for the Doc from KY - he had been denied the right to practice medicine for just over a decade up & until 2 years ago (I think, I had heard 2015)

KY had reinstated his medical license & THAT is why he was so panicked to be able to see his patients the next day

why? because missing scheduled appointments could be viewed as a reason to revoke his newly acquired right to practice

so, now the whole world knows his history and it will very likely cost him business

I hate how litigious we are as a society, but this guy has a real case here on many levels
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118867 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 7:18 pm to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20465 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

KY had reinstated his medical license & THAT is why he was so panicked to be able to see his patients the next day

why? because missing scheduled appointments could be viewed as a reason to revoke his newly acquired right to practice


Under the terms of his limited reinstatement, he's only allowed to see patients one day per week in an outpatient facility. That makes it even more difficult for him.

However, no licensing board is going to penalize you for an airline scheduling problem. This isn't a legitimate argument. Unless, of course, he was in Chicago to exchange prescriptions for sex again. That would hurt him.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20465 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

KY had reinstated his medical license & THAT is why he was so panicked to be able to see his patients the next day

why? because missing scheduled appointments could be viewed as a reason to revoke his newly acquired right to practice


Under the terms of his limited reinstatement, he's only allowed to see patients one day per week in an outpatient facility. That makes it even more difficult for him.

However, no licensing board is going to penalize you for an airline scheduling problem. This isn't a legitimate argument. Unless, of course, he was in Chicago to exchange prescriptions for sex again. That would hurt him.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54613 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 7:25 pm to
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54613 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 7:31 pm to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20465 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 8:50 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter