Started By
Message
Is it illegal to look at the Hillary wikileaks emails?
Posted on 10/16/16 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 10/16/16 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 10/16/16 at 12:29 pm to hawgfaninc
Well supposedly they had classified information, do you could always test the double standard.
Posted on 10/16/16 at 1:02 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Is it illegal to look at the Hillary wikileaks emails? CNN says it is
CNN is should change their name to the Clinton News Network.
Posted on 10/16/16 at 1:31 pm to hawgfaninc
I enjoy /r/The_Donald as much as anyone, but did this really deserve it's own thread?
Posted on 10/16/16 at 2:05 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I enjoy /r/The_Donald as much as anyone, but did this really deserve it's own thread?
but really, yes, yes it did need its own thread. it can't be shared enough
frick the media and frick their corrupt censorship
Posted on 10/16/16 at 2:13 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
but really, yes, yes it did need its own thread. it can't be shared enough
Meh. Until someone gets the 33,000 emails, we won't be left with anything good enough to disqualify her from office to the eyes of the American public. It has to be something even the liberals can't dismiss.
Posted on 10/16/16 at 2:40 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
It has to be something even the liberals can't dismiss.
No such thing. One of the liberal Ten Commandments.
Posted on 10/16/16 at 4:34 pm to hawgfaninc
You know, if you right wing retards hadn't shot your wad years ago on idiotic things like "Vince Foster assassination!", maybe people would take you seriously when you say you've got evidence on the Clintons again.
Posted on 10/16/16 at 4:52 pm to hawgfaninc
I mean he's right?
It is illegal to possess these documents.
He also stated it's different for the media and that they were allowed to look at and show people.
It is illegal to possess these documents.
He also stated it's different for the media and that they were allowed to look at and show people.
Posted on 10/16/16 at 5:06 pm to PrivatePublic
Liberals are able to dismiss everything that would keep America as a sovereign nation and, in the case of the emails, things that compromise national security.
I'm still amazed that average citizens don't see this, and somehow think the liberal elites are "for the common man".
I'm still amazed that average citizens don't see this, and somehow think the liberal elites are "for the common man".
Posted on 10/16/16 at 6:57 pm to hawgfaninc
Maybe she should have had her shite on a secure server? Watching her talk about how we're ''laughably behind...'' everyone regarding tech and how she doesn't know what a hard drive or (C) is/means is hilarious.
This is what happens when you use your private email server and don't fricking archive everything work related.
When you launder money with your foundation.
When you secretly communicate with the President.
When you let media moguls dictate the direction of the State Department.
When you accept bribes.
When you try to delete all traces of emails that make you look bad.
frick her, it's not illegal, it's just irresponsible and reckless, and any member of the military knows we'd get fricked if we ever handled information like this. End of our careers for sure, jail almost certain.
This is what happens when you use your private email server and don't fricking archive everything work related.
When you launder money with your foundation.
When you secretly communicate with the President.
When you let media moguls dictate the direction of the State Department.
When you accept bribes.
When you try to delete all traces of emails that make you look bad.
frick her, it's not illegal, it's just irresponsible and reckless, and any member of the military knows we'd get fricked if we ever handled information like this. End of our careers for sure, jail almost certain.
Posted on 10/16/16 at 7:31 pm to hawgfaninc
You watch CNN Clinton New Network
Posted on 10/16/16 at 8:27 pm to hawgfaninc
Should be illegal for her and Horse hair to run for president.
Posted on 10/17/16 at 1:33 pm to TT9
part 10 of the email leaks dropped earlier. better not be caught reading them or you'll go to jail.
I'm gonna tune in and let CNN tell me what they say.
I'm gonna tune in and let CNN tell me what they say.
This post was edited on 10/17/16 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 10/17/16 at 1:35 pm to Mulat
quote:
You watch CNN
yes. it's my primary source of information.
they're the most impartial of all the major news networks
Posted on 10/17/16 at 1:53 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
aybe she should have had her shite on a secure server?
Haven't all the leaked emails so far been from the hacking of the DNC and Podesta's Gmail account? Not sure what her emails as SOS have to do with anything.
Posted on 10/17/16 at 2:07 pm to DirtyDawg
quote:
I mean he's right? It is illegal to possess these documents. He also stated it's different for the media and that they were allowed to look at and show people.
I think that it depends on how "possession" is defined. One can argue that simply clicking a link and reading is not possession, much like watching a TV show through cable or listening to a radio program; the companies are in possession and you are simply a viewer. The federal gov't, of course, would still likely nail your arse to the wall since the 5th Amendment has been circumvented and they can hold you indefinitely without charges if they really want to.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News