Started By
Message

re: BB attendance vs. Miami (Ohio)

Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:12 pm to
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:12 pm to
In all of these basketball threads I must've made idk.. 20ish posts on the topic, maybe more, expressing why I think things aren't AS bad as many around here think and that the undercurrent is going in the right direction and 1 of those posts takes a jab at a guy using an example that he wanted to axe a future top 5 NFL pick as way to express that maybe he doesn't have an eye and feel for this stuff -- and this is your reaction.

I get. I said something mean to him. But it might be you and others playing out old times more than me.

Taker easy.
Posted by spytiger
Right Behind You
Member since Aug 2015
568 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

On this topic that couldn't be further from the truth. You're welcome to look at the other threads on it and get back to me.


I did!

Here is my list of why people are negative:

Concrete Reasons Mizzou Fans Are Negative
Dead last in SEC, worst of the P5 conferences (twice)
Most losses in a season (twice)
Longest losing streak in Mizzou basketball history
Biggest loss in Mizzou Arena history
NCAA probation
Academic fraud
Zero road wins

Now let's fill out the opposite list:

Concrete Reasons Mizzou Fans Are Positive
???
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 1:14 pm
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:32 pm to
I'm not sure how copy and pasting something you've said shows that you've attempted to absorb my opinions, which is fine, you definitely don't have to. But don't tell me I haven't said anything more than generalities when you're not even willing to read and engage in the things I've said.

Posted by spytiger
Right Behind You
Member since Aug 2015
568 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

But don't tell me I haven't said anything more than generalities when you're not even willing to read and engage in the things I've said.


And yet another post saying you've said things without actually stating them.

You got anything besides hot air and sunshine pumping?
Posted by SemperFi
St Louis
Member since Nov 2015
1514 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 1:37 pm to
Have you always needed special attention?

You offer nothing except repetitive BS.

I don't know whether to laugh even harder at you, or pity you.

How many times, do you need to try to ram your opinion down everyones throat.

Take a break. Preferably a long one.







Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 6:25 pm to
How have you been?

Optimistic about the MLS thing? I hope that happens. It'd be a good thing.

Fowler? What do you think? I'd be a little happier about it if it wasn't 5 years and we didn't have to give a draft pick to the cubs. Don't think he's anything special defensively, probably going to hit in the .260s or .250s, but walks.. Not real thrilled. I asked Santa for Blackmon.

Will be interesting if they can get Encarnancion to take a fat dollar for just 2-3 years. Risky bc he's half-a-dh. It'd be the scary bat in the lineup and they'd be able to super-platoon Carp between 1st and 3rd keeping him and Peralta fresh. Doubt it happens. But cautiously hoping it does.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Concrete Reasons Mizzou Fans Are Negative
Dead last in SEC, worst of the P5 conferences (twice)
Most losses in a season (twice)
Longest losing streak in Mizzou basketball history
Biggest loss in Mizzou Arena history
NCAA probation
Academic fraud
Zero road wins

Now let's fill out the opposite list:

Concrete Reasons Mizzou Fans Are Positive
???



It's not all black and white.

When trying to understand cultural issues and how those have improved it's hard to put it on a black-white list.

When thinking about a full locker room of guys that this staff made relationships with and how it appears these guys are all hard working good humans. It's a good sign. That isn't something you can just list, it has to be kind of projected within yourself if you want to see how it's positive.

I believe there's a guy who'll be eligible at semester who's getting good reviews. That seems like a good thing.

They played some good teams well, and they've played some bad teams bad. Seems like they've relied on shooting, which is gonna be a streaky thing. They're not loaded with talent. They're not supposed to be at this stage. But they seem loaded with good guys who are willing to put in the work to help get this to where we can get better talent. I realize everyone wants a quick fix, but not going to happen.

First two years was a mixed roster. Some issues with an investigation. Culture had to be changed, which is a lot harder than telling kids to not wear hats at the table. It's very difficult for MLB or any sports franchise to change culture. Business's have a hard time with it. It's not easy. KA has been doing a good job to change the culture. Seems like he's brought in solid humans willing to do this the right way. That's all I've said. You guys can go on with the hate. Whatever suits you.
This post was edited on 12/9/16 at 7:11 pm
Posted by spytiger
Right Behind You
Member since Aug 2015
568 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:08 pm to
I ask you for some concrete examples for the positive side and I get paragraphs about how they seem like good guys and a bunch of yammering about "culture".

Damn.

Is it that dark for the Fightin' Kim Andersons?

Here... I can come up with something for you.

Mizzou is in the top ten in FG% defense so far this season.

Bam! Look at that! Something solid that actually exists in reality! Something that can be measured and not easily dismissed.

Concrete Reasons Mizzou Fans Are Negative
Dead last in SEC, worst of the P5 conferences (twice)
Most losses in a season (twice)
Longest losing streak in Mizzou basketball history
Biggest loss in Mizzou Arena history
NCAA probation
Potential academic fraud
Zero road wins

Concrete Reasons Mizzou Fans Are Positive
Mizzou is top ten in FG% defense so far this season

Now... what else?
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:11 pm to
The things I spoke on do exist in reality. Can't be found on a stat sheet, but they're real.

Best to ya, man.



Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 8:23 pm to
Lists of positives so far.
#1 nationally in 3-point defense
Top 100 in fewest turnovers
Hughes play as a freshman, he will be a really good player at Mizzou.

Potential positive adding Barnett next week. Although as we saw with football, adding some grad transfers that didn't play at previous schools. He may not help at all.
Posted by spytiger
Right Behind You
Member since Aug 2015
568 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

#1 nationally in 3-point defense


Doesn't really exist - attempts allowed is the real mark of 3pt defense.

quote:

Top 100 in fewest turnovers

No.

quote:

Hughes play as a freshman, he will be a really good player at Mizzou.


I like Hughes, but he needs to be a lot more efficient. Hopefully learns that as the season goes on.
Posted by spytiger
Right Behind You
Member since Aug 2015
568 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

The things I spoke on do exist in reality. Can't be found on a stat sheet, but they're real.


But you can't prove them, that's the whole point. Spin doctors exist because of this. Facts are facts. Spouting platitudes sounds fake.

Which is why I don't believe you are very invested in Mizzou basketball very much. Sure, you'll say things that sound good, but they are so general and underinformed I might as well wander over to Tigerboard. Statements like "I believe there's a guy who'll be eligible at semester who's getting good reviews." is not very inspiring. For the record, his name is Jordan Barnett and he's a transfer from Texas who played high school basketball in St. Louis. The reports are he is dominating practice with the team. A real Mizzou fan would be more specific like I am.

Here's something you can add to the list: Mizzou is currently top 25 in rebounding per game. Which is pretty good for an undersized team.

That's two concrete positive examples! I just doubled your total without you having to actually learn something about the team.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Doesn't really exist - attempts allowed is the real mark of 3pt defense.


Actually agree with this. Looks like Mizzou has improved from 225 to 147 in opponents 3 pointers attempted. Mostly probably due to abandoning the pack line defense.
Posted by spytiger
Right Behind You
Member since Aug 2015
568 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Actually agree with this. Looks like Mizzou has improved from 225 to 147 in opponents 3 pointers attempted. Mostly probably due to abandoning the pack line defense.


I like the pack line if you have quick guards and wings that can recover. I worry Mizzou is going to get destroyed against P5 teams because they have decent enough post players.

TP sure still rebounds like he is playing pack line D.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 12/9/16 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

But you can't prove them, that's the whole point. Spin doctors exist because of this. Facts are facts. Spouting platitudes sounds fake.



My point is that all of that could be true but it also could have been done without having two of the worst seasons ever historically for the program. I won't say there aren't some positives there. This group does seem to play harder from what I hear and might be more cohesive. But what little positives there are in no way justify bringing KA back again without those positives also resulting in some W's. We are half way through year 3 now.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 12/10/16 at 1:13 am to
quote:


But you can't prove them,


What can't be proven?

That there are solid humans staying after games to shoot, buying tickets for fans ect? That's happening, so it's provable.

That there was a probation -- aiding to the point that there was a culture issue left behind by the previous staff?

That there's a decent guy who's gonna be eligible in a couple weeks who should help?

That there's some decent looking underclassmen?

That there is value in having a locker room full of guys this staff made relationships with instead of a mixed bag?

None of that is provable? It all is.

What I've focused on has zero to do with how many rebounds they're getting, which is pretty much non-substantial at this point of the season anyway.

The other stuff, combined with those things above helps us feel the undercurrent. What is happening below the surface. That's what an AD looks at. What is the direction. Is the environment healthy or not.

To dismiss that Haith left a circus culture here and KA hasn't improved it is shameful negligence. There isn't a stat for that. There doesn't need to be one.

I've said multiple times that KA is likely not the guy to move things forward to the level we want to bet at, but he's succeeding at mission 1A, which is cleaning house and laying a healthy foundation. From the start of this I always thought he was here for that primary reason.

And really, responding on the level of trying to counter negatives with positives like this alters things and creates a limited spectrum. You're sharing stats. I'm sharing thoughts. It's two different things.
This post was edited on 12/10/16 at 1:26 am
Posted by sofa
CoMo
Member since Nov 2013
631 posts
Posted on 12/10/16 at 8:22 am to
I'd pay more attention to this thread if the posts were longer.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111494 posts
Posted on 12/10/16 at 8:50 am to
quote:

I've said multiple times that KA is likely not the guy to move things forward to the level we want to bet at, but he's succeeding at mission 1A, which is cleaning house and laying a healthy foundation. From the start of this I always thought he was here for that primary reason.


I can guarantee you the AD doesn't agree.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 12/10/16 at 8:54 am to
quote:

it also could have been done without having two of the worst seasons ever historically for the program.


This is probably the key. This team is starting now to show some of the same characteristics that KAs CMU teams.
They don't turn the ball over. Make the other team hit tough shots. The problem is that it should have started in year 1 instead of year 3.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 12/10/16 at 9:30 am to
with this roster? Oh fricking please.

Deuce Bello
Johnathan Williams III
Tremaine Isabell
D'Angelo Allen
Namon Wright
Montaque Gill-Caesar
Jakeenan Gant
Ryan Rosburg
Keanau Post

that is where the he started. You gonna tell me we are still there?

Rosburg played great for him. How are the rest of them doing outside of JW III?

Haith was a shite sandwich of epic proportions.
and Krzyzewski couldn't have got this group to play any better.
This post was edited on 12/10/16 at 10:39 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter