Started By
Message
Apparel companies and recruits. Adidas way behind.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 7/6/15 at 12:49 pm
5
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:13 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
Diamonds just want clothes, brah.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:16 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
While the majority of recruits do like Nike more than the other brands the uniforms/uniform brand is not really going to affect the vast majority of recruits decisions.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:46 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
I personally want to be the Wrangler flagship in college football. We can stick with Adidas for the other sports.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:11 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
What about all of the chafing
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:16 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
Florida Gators would eat that up. Think of how many jerseys they would sell.
This post was edited on 7/6/15 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:04 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
I'm blatantly subjective because of my hatred for Nike. That and they make shitty gear while profiting because of their name. Literally everything they produce is a piece of trash, if you own Nike shoes you should just go barefoot instead.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:10 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
Michigan just switched to nike.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:19 pm to cbi8
With the way things are going we will be Adidas's flagship school because we will be their only school.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:25 pm to Requiem For A Dawg
quote:
With the way things are going we will be Adidas's flagship school because we will be their only school.
Adidas is running out of "big" schools fast: state, a&m, miami, ASU, UCLA, Nebraska, Kansas, Louisville, Wisky are their last big ones.
Question: what would it take to get the interlocking nike logo back? Is it possible for adidas to buy it from nike? What are the chances of it ever making a comeback?
ETA: post #3000
This post was edited on 7/6/15 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:31 pm to cbi8
If they really want to drive more sales they should pay whatever Nike wants however I think Nike used it for Montana State or some shite so I'm afraid it'll never happen.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:49 pm to DMagic
Yeah it isn't even something we want at this point. The whole point of the new logo campaign after Mullen got here was to usher in a new era of our athletic program. I'm all for putting the past behind us and moving forward.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 4:01 pm to skirpnasty
The anniversary jerseys were fresh and need to stay however you can't tell me the interlocking MSU isn't the best. I find it hard to believe that a significant amount of state fans wouldn't feel the same.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 4:15 pm to DMagic
quote:
If they really want to drive more sales they should pay whatever Nike wants however I think Nike used it for Montana State or some shite so I'm afraid it'll never happen
Frickin Missouri State has it. I know because I saw a Black on Black interlocking MSU hat and bought it. About three hours later someone pointed out to me that is said Missouri State on the back. I was unhappy. Didn't see it cause it was black on black.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 4:17 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
Yeah it isn't even something we want at this point. The whole point of the new logo campaign after Mullen got here was to usher in a new era of our athletic program. I'm all for putting the past behind us and moving forward.
You make a solid point, but I still want dat logo doe
Posted on 7/6/15 at 4:22 pm to Rayburn8
quote:
Frickin Missouri State has it. I know because I saw a Black on Black interlocking MSU hat and bought it. About three hours later someone pointed out to me that is said Missouri State on the back. I was unhappy. Didn't see it cause it was black on black.
This one?
Not the same as our logo...
Posted on 7/6/15 at 4:37 pm to Rayburn8
quote:
Frickin Missouri State has it. I know because I saw a Black on Black interlocking MSU hat and bought it. About three hours later someone pointed out to me that is said Missouri State on the back. I was unhappy. Didn't see it cause it was black on black.
That's what you get for buying a black on black hat.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 5:01 pm to Rayburn8
This is the only one I could find that was similar from Montana state. Go Bobcats!
Posted on 7/6/15 at 5:18 pm to DMagic
Posted on 7/6/15 at 6:06 pm to cbi8
Not a big deal. Just like Georgia and Grambling having the same logo. Everyone associates that with the Georgia or hell maybe even the Packers depending on what part of the country you're from.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News