Started By
Message
6-6 or 8-4 ???
Posted on 11/26/12 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 11/26/12 at 2:45 pm
6-6 with this:
Or 8-4 with this:
Or 8-4 with this:
3
Posted on 11/26/12 at 2:50 pm to slidog
But seriously...I would obviously rather have 8-4 record. I will still bitch and moan about losing to them though.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 2:53 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
I would really consider this. I guess it depends on what wins I would have to give up.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 3:03 pm to slidog
If we start worrying about the egg bowl every year instead of the overall record/success of the program we are going to have a very low ceiling. Worrying about them instead of our internal team will get us no where.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 6:21 pm to slidog
They were not going to be down forever. If anything I look at this loss as a chance for Mullen to clean this staff up and make some fricking good hires.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 6:27 pm to Jma313
Full agreement.
No doubt Mullen has the best players in position (with the exception on Nick Griffin) but this 2012 team couldn't figure out who it wanted to be on offense OR Defense through one game much less all year.. Les Konning and his play calling inability is expired goods..
No doubt Mullen has the best players in position (with the exception on Nick Griffin) but this 2012 team couldn't figure out who it wanted to be on offense OR Defense through one game much less all year.. Les Konning and his play calling inability is expired goods..
Posted on 11/26/12 at 7:09 pm to slidog
This is stupid. 8-4
Posted on 11/26/12 at 7:34 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
But seriously...I would obviously rather have 8-4 record. I will still bitch and moan about losing to them though.
100% agree.
It sucks but not as bad as a 6-6 season.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News