Started By
Message

re: Dylan Brooks

Posted on 2/19/21 at 10:51 am to
Posted by LSUTiger in TN
The Alleged Music City
Member since May 2008
493 posts
Posted on 2/19/21 at 10:51 am to
It says the release granted to him excludes him from going to another SEC school.
Posted by GeauxJZK
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2017
1625 posts
Posted on 2/19/21 at 10:54 am to
Not saying you’re wrong but where are you seeing that? The story I posted says “free to play wherever he wants”.
Posted by Tzanghi
Member since Nov 2020
766 posts
Posted on 2/19/21 at 11:00 am to
I’ve seen both reports. It seems like they initially were restricting him and then decided not to restrict him. Not 100% confident on this interpretation yet, but he appears to be free. If so, go get him, O.

Can’t imagine he’s very interested in Auburn at this point with new staff and a poor class.
This post was edited on 2/19/21 at 11:01 am
Posted by Keaux10
Grand Isle
Member since Feb 2019
1769 posts
Posted on 2/19/21 at 11:24 am to
quote:

It says the release granted to him excludes him from going to another SEC school.
Clemson makes the most sense here if true
Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
3309 posts
Posted on 2/19/21 at 2:59 pm to
I thought the NCAA stopped allowing schools to put restrictions on transfers a couple years back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram