Started By
Message

re: Top Ten SEC coaches of all time

Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:53 pm to
Posted by VFL1800FPD
Nashville, TN
Member since Aug 2012
9056 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:53 pm to
You are thick. Find me a list with spurrier over neyland and I'll shut up. But you won't.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:55 pm to
I don't need lists, I have facts on my side. Who won more SEC titles?
Posted by VFL1800FPD
Nashville, TN
Member since Aug 2012
9056 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:58 pm to
Spurrier. Who won seven conference titles in what is and was the SEC
This post was edited on 7/31/14 at 2:59 pm
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:00 pm to
Neither one of them won 7 SEC titles.
Posted by Volatile
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2014
5470 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:27 pm to
FFS

Neyland is clearly the better coach.

If he hadn't taken several tours of duty (and before you say well duh it was WWII he served several years before that as well.) He would have added to an even better resume.

Spurrier should probably be #3 or 4, but to say he's better than Neyland is just rank trolling.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:07 pm to
You're certainly entitled to your own opinion.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:19 pm to
As much as I hate to admit it, I'm going to side with the Volunteers here. I really like OBC, I do, and (imho) he's one of the Greats of college football. But Neyland is a true legend, almost on par with the Bear himself. We can throw around statistics and numbers, and they won't "prove" anything because no objective number is any more reliable than the subjective value we assign to it. So my opinion is mostly just to show that other people besides UT fans -- indeed, other people who consider UT a rival -- also rank Neyland slightly above Spurrier. Given his ability to turn USCe around lately, that stands a good chance of changing when all is said and done.

To be honest, I'm glad I don't have to rank them at all. Accusations of bias based on Neyland's historical status vs Spurrier's ongoing contemporaneous status would be fair, as would pointing out that Spurrier still has more years to pad his numbers. So if I were forced to rank them at all, I'd be perfectly comfortable putting them in a tie.

(Incidentally, there's no reason to leave out any antecedents to the SEC when compiling the numbers. The Southern conference was so much a direct predecessor to the SEC that every single SEC member was also a Southern Conference member. Ten of the current fourteen members of the SEC were also members of the Southern Conference. That's pretty solid continuity there.)
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:21 pm to
The media guide starts with 1933.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

The media guide starts with 1933.


Yes, because that was the first season of the conference in its current incarnation. The Southern Conference still exists, after all, albeit without a single charter member. There's no continuity there. The point I was making was one of what I considered reasonable continuity, not some empirical standard of inclusion. Choices made by the creators of the media guide don't necessarily invalidate a willingness to consider the prior incarnation. You can choose not to, just as I can choose to do so.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:31 pm to
I can just start claiming random SEC titles then. Screw the media guide.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

I can just start claiming random SEC titles then. Screw the media guide.


If you can make a convincing argument for a title that the media guid omits, certainly. I can make a convincing argument for the inclusion of Southern Conference data in this particular discussion of greatest SEC coaches, even if it doesn't convince you personally. So I'm quite willing to hear your argument for the "random SEC titles" you want to assign to Florida.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:35 pm to
You don't need to convince me of anything. I have facts on my side.
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12261 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

You don't need to convince me of anything. I have facts on my side.


Your commitment to this hair brained troll is commendable.

Of course 2 of his conference titles wouldn't be in the SEC media guide as they were won before it officially began in 1933.

Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

You don't need to convince me of anything. I have facts on my side.


You have facts. They don't take a position, however. They're facts. Note above where I point out that the value of these "objective" numbers depends on the subjective weight you assign them.

Look, I agree OBC is one of the truly great coaches in SEC history. I even think they're so close as to be hard to rank. Even your facts tend to put them in something akin to a statistical dead heat. Spurrier has more wins (in an era of more games per season.) Neyland has a much better win percentage. Spurrier did the bulk of his damage in a relatively weak period of SEC history, but has come on strong in the more recent, stronger period over the last few years. Neyland had his own periods of feast and famine in terms of the SEC's strength. And so forth. It's all about interpretation here, as I pointed out. So, once again, I'm mostly saying this to rebut your misapprehension that's it's just UT fans taking that particular stance.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Your commitment to this hair brained troll is commendable.

Of course 2 of his conference titles wouldn't be in the SEC media guide as they were won before it officially began in 1933.

Just like Bielema's 3 B1G titles don't count as SEC.
Posted by VFL1800FPD
Nashville, TN
Member since Aug 2012
9056 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:53 pm to
There are no teams that have been in the b1g and the sec. There are 11 teams in common between the SEC and SC. Shut it
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:58 pm to
Take it up with the SEC then, not me.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 5:10 pm to
quote:


Take it up with the SEC then, not me.


I just called Slive (I have a Bama friend, so I can get his personal cell number) and he agrees with me. The only reason he won't change things is because the printing costs for the extra pages in the guide would be prohibitive.


True story.
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12261 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Just like Bielema's 2 B1G titties don't count as SEC.


FYP!

Neyland also didn't start coaching another team. He coached the same team and that team became a part of a new league with all the teams he already played. Your argument is beyond short sighted
Posted by VFL1800FPD
Nashville, TN
Member since Aug 2012
9056 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 6:03 pm to
He's trolling us
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter