Started By
Message
re: Why are some Missouri fans so threatened by Thompson?
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:35 pm to TigerCruise
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:35 pm to TigerCruise
Lol! I have tried to find that gif for a long time! Thank you!
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:38 pm to TigerCruise
You're proving my point even further
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:40 pm to CNB
What, that half of the active threads on the front page involve USC/Mizzou/USC's QB Situation?
Get off your high horse CNB, no one really gives a shite about USCjr, I've just been bored out of my mind and Thompson couldn't be an easier target to poke the cocks with.
Get off your high horse CNB, no one really gives a shite about USCjr, I've just been bored out of my mind and Thompson couldn't be an easier target to poke the cocks with.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:42 pm to TigerCruise
quote:
no one really gives a shite about USCjr
Well this is blatantly a lie. There are several Mizz posters here that care very much for USC.
I respect their baseball accomplishments and their improvements in football. I care too. I don't think I'm alone. Get better stats.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:47 pm to roadGator
Mizzou fans enjoy bantering with USC fans on here, I honestly think the average Mizzou fans care level isn't any higher for USC then it is for any other SEC school.
On the other hand, USCjr fans are clearly upset they finished 2nd in the East last year.
On the other hand, USCjr fans are clearly upset they finished 2nd in the East last year.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:48 pm to CNB
quote:
Why are some Missouri fans so threatened by Thompson?
I'm afraid he'll steal my girlfriend from me
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:51 pm to CNB
They just hate all SC QB's. Shaw completed 20 consecutive passes the year before and then orchestrated the 4th Q comeback.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:53 pm to TigerCruise
quote:
See this is where we Mizzou fans get excited, because we haven't had bad WR's since, I don't even know when:
2007
Jeremy Maclin 80 1055 13.2 82 (TD) 9
Martin Rucker 84 834 9.9 40 (TD) 8
Will Franklin 49 709 14.5 72 4
Chase Coffman 52 531 10.2 33 7
Danario Alexander 37 417 11.3 48 (TD) 2
Tommy Saunders 41 397 9.7 28 1
Jared Perry 13 152 11.7 45 0
Derrick Washington 10 70 7.0 25 1
2008
Jeremy Maclin 102 1260 12.4 80 (TD) 13
Chase Coffman 90 987 11.0 48 10
Tommy Saunders 72 833 11.6 69 7
Jared Perry 41 567 13.8 38 4
Danario Alexander 26 329 12.7 39 5
Derrick Washington 29 277 9.6 28 (TD) 2
Andrew Jones 20 146 7.3 15 0
2009
Danario Alexander 113 1781 15.8 84 (TD) 14
Jared Perry 46 696 15.1 48 (TD) 6
Jerrell Jackson 37 458 12.4 70 (TD) 2
Wes Kemp 23 418 18.2 56 3
Derrick Washington 26 156 6.0 36 0
2010
T.J. Moe 92 1045 11.4 68 (TD) 6
Michael Egnew 90 762 8.5 29 5
Jerrell Jackson 50 656 13.1 38 (TD) 3
Wes Kemp 39 420 10.8 35 3
2011
T.J. Moe 54 649 12.0 40 4
Michael Egnew 50 523 10.5 39 (TD) 3
Marcus Lucas 23 414 18.0 53 (TD) 5
Wes Kemp 29 369 12.7 40 (TD) 5
L'Damian Washington 20 364 18.2 45 (TD) 3
Jerrell Jackson 17 222 13.1 25 1
Henry Josey 10 91 9.1 36 0
2012
Marcus Lucas 46 509 11.1 41 (TD) 3
L'Damian Washington 25 443 17.7 74 (TD) 2
T.J. Moe 40 399 10.0 27 1
Dorial Green-Beckham 28 395 14.1 80 (TD) 5
Gahn McGaffie 33 266 8.1 24 0
Bud Sasser 10 231 23.1 85 (TD) 1
Jimmie Hunt 11 199 18.1 33 3
2013
L'Damian Washington 50 893 17.9 96 (TD) 10
Dorial Green-Beckham 59 883 15.0 68 (TD) 12
Marcus Lucas 58 692 11.9 43 3
Bud Sasser 26 361 13.9 60 1
Jimmie Hunt 22 253 11.5 52 1
Jaleel Clark 10 88 8.8 14 0
Marcus Murphy 11 79 7.2 24 1
Darius White 7 76 10.9 37 (TD) 1
Let me know when you start seeing the pattern of guys slowly increasing catches(cept 2011, Franklin Ran the ball an arse ton).
I think my favorite is the increase in production by DX.
Sasser and Hunt both have 50+ receptions this year, without question.
That's all impressive and all - I mean, we all know that Missouri was formerly in the pass-happy, no-defense Big12. No need to prove what needs no proving.
My post was in direct response to a Mizzou poster who said USC's WRs will be young and inexperienced in 2014, when the truth is they will be deeper and return more production than the unit has in many years. In other words, my response was to totally blow up his post, which it did so nicely.
What your post in response to mine is supposed to address, I couldn't begin to decipher. All I see from it is that once upon a time Mizzou had a bunch of 90+ and 100+ catch receivers, but nowadays struggle to have 40+ and 50+ catch receivers. Is this that pattern you were referring to? And that Missouri lost their top 3 leading receivers from last season. I guess that's good reason for Mizzou fans to get excited, as you say....
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:55 pm to CockInYourEar
Nope. I have a ton of respect for Shaw. He was a great player and leader. Thompson is nowhere near him in either regard.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:58 pm to ConwayGamecock
The max number of receptions are fairly meaningless in the grand scheme of things, Mizzou runs the ball far more now then they did back in 2007.
The point is, every year Mizzou has guys catch 50+ passes, the year or two before that the same guy caught 20-30 passes. The pattern there is Sasser and Hunt are on the exact same player development curve that guys like Alexander, Moe, Lucas, and Washington were on. The numbers are so consistent it's quite staggering actually. Mizzou develops its players in it's system and then plugs them in when there's an opening.
The whole idea that Mizzou returns no experience or depth is hilarious. Sasser and Hunt are both on the exact same pace to catch 50-60 passes for 700-1000 yards that Lucas/Washington were on.
Don't you guys know we have a system.
The point is, every year Mizzou has guys catch 50+ passes, the year or two before that the same guy caught 20-30 passes. The pattern there is Sasser and Hunt are on the exact same player development curve that guys like Alexander, Moe, Lucas, and Washington were on. The numbers are so consistent it's quite staggering actually. Mizzou develops its players in it's system and then plugs them in when there's an opening.
The whole idea that Mizzou returns no experience or depth is hilarious. Sasser and Hunt are both on the exact same pace to catch 50-60 passes for 700-1000 yards that Lucas/Washington were on.
Don't you guys know we have a system.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 7/24/14 at 6:09 pm to TigerCruise
quote:
The max number of receptions are fairly meaningless in the grand scheme of things, Mizzou runs the ball far more now then they did back in 2007.
The point is, every year Mizzou has guys catch 50+ passes, the year or two before that the same guy caught 20-30 passes. The pattern there is Sasser and Hunt are on the exact same player development curve that guys like Alexander, Moe, Lucas, and Washington were on. The numbers are so consistent it's quite staggering actually. Mizzou develops its players in it's system and then plugs them in when there's an opening.
The whole idea that Mizzou returns no experience or depth is hilarious. Sasser and Hunt are both on the exact same pace to catch 50-60 passes for 700-1000 yards that Lucas/Washington were on.
Don't you guys know we have a system.
LOL, all I'm trying to get through to you is, all your posts directed to me regarding your returning WR talent is pointless, because I wasn't ever questioning your returning WR talent to begin with. My 1st post in this thread was in response to a Mizzou poster questioning USC's returning WR talent. I corrected him, without even giving the slightest mention or implication about Mizzou's WR issue....
I mean, geez...
Posted on 7/24/14 at 6:48 pm to CNB
Because in their hearts they know he'll do better than Maty Mauk this season and it makes them insecure
Posted on 7/24/14 at 7:51 pm to CNB
.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:02 pm to ConwayGamecock
quote:
That's all impressive and all - I mean, we all know that Missouri was formerly in the pass-happy, no-defense Big12. No need to prove what needs no proving.
Actually, I believe Franklin's numbers in the SEC last year were good enough for top 10 in Mizzou history and that's with missing 4 games. Put his and Mauk's numbers together and it's probably top 5. So yeah, I'd expect it to continue next year too.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:13 pm to reedus23
What a bunch of dildo hack jack wagons that make up the SC posting fan base.
I feel dumber having read this thread.
And roadie, just so we're back in the swing of football season, Gfy.
I feel dumber having read this thread.
And roadie, just so we're back in the swing of football season, Gfy.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:19 pm to the808bass
Whats going on in this thread?
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:21 pm to kilo
SC fans are measuring their dicks with micrometers again. That means football season is ramping up.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:21 pm to kilo
SC fan posting about Missouri fans.
Give ya one guess.
Give ya one guess.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
kilo
quote:
the808bass
And good to see you guys.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News