Started By
Message
re: How will your team prepare for Maty Mauk?
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:25 pm to Remote Controlled
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:25 pm to Remote Controlled
the one true Matt Mauck led LSU to a natty in '03. He is now a dentist. I will prepare for him like I always do, brush AND floss after every meal. 
1
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:30 pm to DamnStrong1860
quote:
the one true Matt Mauck led LSU to a natty in '03. He is now a dentist. I will prepare for him like I always do, brush AND floss after every meal.
frick yeah!!!!!
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:38 pm to Remote Controlled
quote:
Remote Controlled
You're drinking tonight, aren't you? I'm always entertained when you drunk-post. You get people all flustered and wondering if you're serious. Well done, RC!! Well done.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 5:34 am to theGarnetWay
quote:
Yeah right. I've never seen a team so affected by it than 2013 UGA was. Your new QB is a dead man.
That was 2012 and HM likes the Techno so he will be groovin thanks to your shitty music
Posted on 7/23/14 at 6:32 am to mikrit54
quote:
Nice East ring there sport. But seriously, East?
So you're happy with 3rd or 4th in the West and wouldn't trade it for a East crown?
Posted on 7/23/14 at 6:34 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
Dust off the gameplan from last year
You don't have the other QB to come in and save your ajfajo this time
Posted on 7/23/14 at 7:09 am to Remote Controlled
Posted on 7/23/14 at 7:17 am to Remote Controlled
How can you call Bama out on that when they played AU much tougher than Missouri did. Missouri didn't show up for the 4th quarter while Bama played tough down to the last second.
Also there is no way Missouri wins in Columbia. Pinkel for his career is 15-34 vs top 25 teams, 4-20 vs top 10 teams, and 28-32 in road games.
As far as Maty Mauk goes, if he is such a stud why didn't any of the major SEC schools offer him? I believe Missouri and Vandy were his two SEC offers.
Also there is no way Missouri wins in Columbia. Pinkel for his career is 15-34 vs top 25 teams, 4-20 vs top 10 teams, and 28-32 in road games.
As far as Maty Mauk goes, if he is such a stud why didn't any of the major SEC schools offer him? I believe Missouri and Vandy were his two SEC offers.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 7:23 am to AUwarrior5
quote:
As far as Maty Mauk goes, if he is such a stud why didn't any of the major SEC schools offer him?
Here's his list of offers:
Ball St.
Buffalo
Cincinnati
Illinois
Iowa
Kent St.
Kentucky
Louisville
LSU
Michigan
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio St.
Penn St.
Vanderbilt
LINK
This post was edited on 7/23/14 at 7:24 am
Posted on 7/23/14 at 7:26 am to AUwarrior5
Probably because he's from Ohio? The state where he set multiple High School records.
Pinkel was 5-2 last year against ranked teams. See how meaningless stats are?
Pinkel was 5-2 last year against ranked teams. See how meaningless stats are?
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:27 pm to Wtodd
That isn't his list of offers that is the list of schools who recruited him. Here's his real list of offers:
Missouri
Ball St
Buffalo
Cincinnati
Illinois
Michigan
Kent St
Notre Dame
Vandy
Missouri
Ball St
Buffalo
Cincinnati
Illinois
Michigan
Kent St
Notre Dame
Vandy
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:38 pm to Wtodd
quote:
So you're happy with 3rd or 4th in the West and wouldn't trade it for a East crown?
I'd rather compete for the conference title and NC as we've been doing for the past several years. Great, you won the east but it's not the crystal ball. Oh, and here's another type of ring.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:42 pm to AUwarrior5
quote:
AUwarrior5
quote:
That isn't his list of offers that is the list of schools who recruited him. Here's his real list of offers:
You're right...I was going to edit my post and forgot.....that damn work thing getting in the way
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:43 pm to mikrit54
quote:
I'd rather compete for the conference title and NC as we've been doing for the past several years. Great, you won the east but it's not the crystal ball. Oh, and here's another type of ring.
We competed for the conference title and working for the NC......nice ring other than the LSU part.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:47 pm to TigerCruise
quote:
Pinkel was 5-2 last year against ranked teams. See how meaningless stats are?
I would like to know who those 5 wins are. SC and AU were the losses, I would imagine UGA, UF, Ole Miss, and TAMU were ranked when you played them but who is the 5th? Vandy was ranked in the final poll but I don't think they were when you played them. EDIT- The 5th was OkieSt in the bowl game.
Either way last year is less relevant for Pinkel and Missouri than for most teams because of the huge loss of players at Missouri. Its not like there's a cupboard full of blue chippers waiting for their shot either. Recruiting has been a struggle since Missouri joined the SEC, consistently finishing near the bottom.
Here are some stats that I think you'll find meaningful this season.
#102 -your NCAA rank in % of tackles returning
#113 -your NCAA rank in % of yards returning
#111 -your NCAA rank in % of lettermen returning
This post was edited on 7/23/14 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:47 pm to Wtodd
quote:
We competed for the conference title and working for the NC......nice ring other than the LSU part.
Aww....don't get so mad.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 1:32 pm to mikrit54
oh boy. once again the mizzou douchiness staining the rant. one hit wonder fluke year and these douches get out of their minds. the reality of the sec will soon settle in to these dulards. mauk is untested and of seemingly average skill set. Dylan Thompson throws for 600 yards more than bowtie boy. effin Yankee tits.
This post was edited on 7/23/14 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 7/23/14 at 1:33 pm to mikrit54
quote:
I'd rather compete for the conference title and NC as we've been doing for the past several years. Great, you won the east but it's not the crystal ball. Oh, and here's another type of ring.
Here's another type of ring:
Posted on 7/23/14 at 1:38 pm to carolinaswamper
quote:
oh boy. once again the mizzou douchiness staining the rant. one hit wonder fluke year and these douches get out of their minds. the reality of the sec will soon settle in to these dulards. mauk is untested and of seemingly average skill set. Dylan Thompson throws for 600 yards more than bowtie boy. effin Yankee tits.
Well said. They had a good season but come on! How about doing this in the SEC on a yearly basis before you talk shite. One year is not a dynasty or a trend. You sir, get an Upvote.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 1:40 pm to carolinaswamper
quote:
Dylan Thompson
You're really gonna hang your hat on a waste of a scholarship? What's scary is that SC doesn't have an underclassman better than Thompson. Not a very bright future for SC.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News