Started By
Message
re: "Christians didn't invent marriage. Why do they think they can define it."
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:12 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:12 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Can a couple in a domestic partnership not incorporate and get the tax benefits?
I don't care if you call it a monkey orgy as long as the end result is the same.
2
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:13 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
But, Can a couple in a domestic partnership not incorporate and get the tax benefits? I'll hang up and listen
They can incorporate, but why should they have to? Why can't one incorporate, and the other work for a big conglomerate with great benefits? And then get his partner on their plan?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:13 pm to Duke
quote:
I don't care if you call it a monkey orgy as long as the end result is the same.
End result is not the same.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:14 pm to Duke
quote:
I don't care if you call it a monkey orgy as long as the end result is the same.
Exactly, and I don't think Alahunter would disagree. I could be wrong.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:14 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
But, Can
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:15 pm to sorantable
quote:
sorantable
Shut your fat mouth
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:16 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
End result is not the same.
It's not, how so?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:16 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
End result is not the same.
I'll refer you back to the "as long as the end result is the same" portion of my post.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:16 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
It's not, how so?
I provided a perfect example.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:17 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:18 pm to sorantable
I thought they preferred funnels?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:19 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I provided a perfect example.
A perfect example? That wasn't perfect.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:19 pm to Rebelgator
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:19 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
I thought they preferred funnels?
We do
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:20 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
I don't think Alahunter would disagree. I could be wrong.
He was pretty clear about his feelings on the taxes part. At one point called it welfare for the married. At least the motherfricker is consistent with his government out of everything viewpoint.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:20 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
A perfect example? That wasn't perfect.
It was an example of economic freedom not possible without being married.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:22 pm to Duke
quote:
At least the motherfricker is consistent with his government out of everything viewpoint.
Stick by your convictions, even when you're dead wrong. Or if you're a politician, especially when you're dead wrong.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:22 pm to Duke
quote:
At one point called it welfare for the married.
He's right about it being welfare for the married.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:23 pm to sorantable
Why does government get to define marriage? Why is government involved at all? Why does our government discriminate on the basis of marital status? Marriage should be purely a ceremony, the domain of the church. If two people want to get married, all they have to do is say they're married. The government should have no input nor should the government care.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:24 pm to brodeo
quote:
Why does government get to define marriage? Why is government involved at all? Why does our government discriminate on the basis of marital status? Marriage should be purely a ceremony, the domain of the church. If two people want to get married, all they have to do is say they're married. The government should have no input nor should the government care.
Taxes.
Page 6 of 15
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News