Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/23/14 at 12:01 am to SunHog
Seriously, those look fricking sweet. I don't get the outrage, and I agree with arkyhawk that the DMAC jerseys were bland.
The mere fact that people call them the DMAC jerseys illustrates how the affinity stems from nostalgia.
The mere fact that people call them the DMAC jerseys illustrates how the affinity stems from nostalgia.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 12:07 am to Stonehog
Yes they are.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 12:08 am to SunHog
Those unis are clean as hell 
Posted on 4/23/14 at 12:12 am to wmr
quote:
I like em. They are a unique design, not just a bunch of stock Nike shite thrown together like the past couple of years have been.
I have a good feeling the fan base will embrace these rather quickly.
I do see a hint of tradition (64') in these yet they are Oregon modern.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 12:13 am to Stonehog
quote:
The mere fact that people call them the DMAC jerseys illustrates how the affinity stems from nostalgia.
It's alot easier than saying 06-07 too. Everyone remembers how we looked during those years. Nobody remembers the specifics of the jerseys most other years since because all the uniforms have been pretty meh. Also is 06-07 the last couple year stretch where nothing changed(that I can remember) on the uni? I know 05 had different leg stripes but they were very solid uni's too.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 12:17 am to wmr
quote:
I like em. They are a unique design, not just a bunch of stock Nike shite thrown together like the past couple of years have been.
That's exactly what Adidas did with the Dick uniforms. They took a cheap red jersey and slapped Arkansas on the front and that was it.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 12:24 am to pivey14
I'm really sick of jersey picture/video reveal shots.. Fools always gotta be flexing and acting like they're all amped up after a big play. 
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News