Started By
Message

re: What Killed Ole Miss Football?

Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:08 pm to
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18060 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:08 pm to
Why do LSU fans keep forgetting that Ole Miss has won 2 of the last 4 football games?

Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Why do LSU fans keep forgetting that Ole Miss has won 2 of the last 4 football games?



Wut? No we haven't.
Posted by DingDongEddieStrong
Member since Aug 2013
3779 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:11 pm to
A few reasons:

-The obvious is our inability to recruit black players. Other schools in the South, namely Alabama, had the same issues the University had, but Bear Bryant realized they were superior athletes. Once he decided this was fine, UA was cool with it. Ole Miss did this far too late, and the gap worsened.

-We divided our home games between Oxford and Jackson, like Arkansas does with LR & Fayetteville and Alabama did with Birmingham & T-town. For years, we would play our bigger games in Jackson because the stadium was bigger, thus neglecting VHS and not improving our facilities until 1997 when Tuberville arrived. He made a focus to improve the facilities in Oxford, getting rid of all home games in Jackson and increasing the home field advantage on campus. This is also when the Grove became the tailgate spectacle it is today.

-Lack of leadership in the athletic department. UM has had horrible leadership from 1960 until 2011, hiring ex-Vaught players to run the department when they absolutely were not qualified. The Good Ole Boy System completely destroyed all athletic programs in the 70s, 80s and 90s. Our current AD, Ross Bjork, is the first AD we have had that was a complete outsider to the program, and he has made tremendous improvements from an admin. level that Oxford has never had before.

-There are around 8 public universities in a state that has less than 3 million residents. Two are in the SEC and have to split resources between each other and smaller schools. You have one College Board running the entire system, not individual Board of Trustees making decisions for each school like everyone else has. There again, it comes down to leadership.


This post was edited on 4/18/14 at 2:43 pm
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42346 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

While integration definitely had an effect on Ole Miss' program , there are other factors that should be noted. A facilities armsrace started in the SEC in the 1970's . Ole Miss fell way way behind. We didn't even gets lights at VHS until the late 1980's.


Arkansas didn't have lights in DWRRS until the 80s either, we played half our home games in WMS which had lights.

Arkansas was at the top of the SWC in terms of facilities with Texas and aTm, moving to the SEC we were not mid-pack...
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18060 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Why do LSU fans keep forgetting that Ole Miss has won 2 of the last 4 football games?



Wut? No we haven't.



Brain fart and it stinks. I meant 3 of the last 6.

Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18060 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:14 pm to
Ole Miss also had a Chancellor at the time that did not spend any money on facilities or support for the athletic department. He actually didn't spend any money on facilities at the school either. When Khayat came on board the first thing he did was rennovate just about every building on campus.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

How awesome would it be if Mississippi only had one large University in the state and that was in the SEC? How different would things be and how good would their history have been?



Meh, people always say this but the persona and culture of the school would be completely different if that were the case.

You probably don't know this, but the sole reason Mississippi State was established was out of hatred toward Ole Miss. When the federal Morrill Act (I believe ) was enacted in the 1870's designating land grant institutions with funding for Agricultural schools, an ag school was established at Ole Miss. The ag school opened and NO ONE came. The kids that were targeted for this would not attend the school where the "uppity" kids from the Delta and river counties went to school. (Ole Miss was regarded at that time as a bastion for old Mississippi aristocracy). So the ag schools doors were shuttered and the legislature voted to open an ag school in Starkville. MSU was called A&M until the late 1930's I believe. It didn't become a university until 1959. Prior to 1959, Ole Miss was the only university in the state.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 10:27 pm
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36105 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

How awesome would it be if Mississippi only had one large University in the state and that was in the SEC?



They would compare to LSU IMO. Although a smaller state than Louisiana they should do quite well because of their outstanding talent per capita.

In saying this I'm assuming that they would have gotten their shite together RE: civil rights and integration a little sooner.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

In saying this I'm assuming that they would have gotten their shite together RE: civil rights and integration a little sooner.



I don't understand how having one school versus two would have had any effect on this. You do know that all of the unrest at Ole Miss during the Meredith crisis was caused by out of town and out of state people that traveled to the university? The students were by and large not the instigators.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68437 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:39 pm to
You need to come over here more Toddy
Posted by DingDongEddieStrong
Member since Aug 2013
3779 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:40 pm to
I truly believe if we were not called the Rebels and didn't use all the symbols associated with it for decades, we would not be in this position.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68437 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

I truly believe if we were not called the Rebels and didn't use all the symbols associated with it for decades, we would not be in this position.

"Rebels" isn't racist in any way. Colonel Reb was modeled after a black man but with so much hate associated with the mascot, it was time to go. The confederate flags hurt more than anything recently.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36105 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:45 pm to
quote:


I don't understand how having one school versus two would have had any effect on this.



It would have required that the more liberal power brokers in Mississippi gained traction in the state's only flagship university.

It is not a safe assumption, which is why I felt the need to make the qualifying statement.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36105 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

"Rebels" isn't racist in any way.



Perception is what we're talking about IMO. Mississippi sort of posterized itself as the symbol of southern racism by continuing to cling to the more visible symbols of the civil war and the old south associated with racism. It isn't entirely fair given that plenty of racism obviously existed in places like Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama and South Carolina... but a lot of the damage is frankly self inflicted.
Posted by DingDongEddieStrong
Member since Aug 2013
3779 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:53 pm to

quote:


Perception is what we're talking about IMO. Mississippi sort of posterized itself as the symbol of southern racism by continuing to cling to the more visible symbols of the civil war and the old south associated with racism.


THIS.

Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

I truly believe if we were not called the Rebels and didn't use all the symbols associated with it for decades, we would not be in this position.



There is no doubt that all of the Old South symbolism has hurt us. Most people don't realize this, in 1936 when the "Rebels' name was chosen for the team, a LOT of alumni and students were not happy with this. Many people didn't want a team name as they thought the name "OLE MISS" was strong enough to stand on its own. Many thought adding a team name tarnished the "uniqueness" of the school. I kinda wish that sentiment had prevailed.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

You need to come over here more Toddy



Thanks
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 11:17 pm to
Everyone is missing the biggest factor.

Bear Bryant came to Bama in 1958 and won 3 national titles in 8 years and took the mantle away from Ole Miss.

Really very simple, Bear moves in and Ole Miss is history.

Doesn't have a damn thing to do with anything else.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68437 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

Bear Bryant came to Bama in 1958 and won 3 national titles in 8 years and took the mantle away from Ole Miss.

Ole miss "won" three in four years during that time period. So no he didn't. The Bear wouldn't schedule us either
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42346 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 11:21 pm to
So why was Bear so ineffective while at Kentucky?

Why did the SWC leave him behind while at aTm?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter