Started By
Message
re: NCAA Proposing to reduce Drug Abuse Penalty
Posted on 4/16/14 at 1:59 pm to profwilson
Posted on 4/16/14 at 1:59 pm to profwilson
quote:
God forbid we should expect athletes to comply with FEDERAL law (which applies everywhere in the United States, regardless of whatever any state might choose to do).
Prohibition used to be a FEDERAL LAW.
1
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:00 pm to cas4t
quote:
welcome to 2014. We don't hate figs, we smoke weed,
Preach
quote:
we believe in women's rights.
Whoa man lets not get crazy
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:01 pm to DMagic
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:02 pm to profwilson
quote:I saw what a few hundred Nevada cowboys and ranchers on horeseback had in mind for the FEDERAL law enforcers last week. Pot smokers are peaceful people.
God forbid we should expect athletes to comply with FEDERAL law (which applies everywhere in the United States, regardless of whatever any state might choose to do).
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:06 pm to DMagic
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:06 pm to skullopener
Doesnt the NCAA delegate drug policies to each individual school?
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:07 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Doesnt the NCAA delegate drug policies to each individual school?
I don't think so? I think there is a standard across the board, then schools can also enforce whatever they want.
I could be wrong I guess, but this is what I've always thought.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:17 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Prohibition used to be a FEDERAL LAW.
If you are equating the legal status of weed to prohibition.....put down the bong.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:18 pm to arrakis
quote:
If you are equating the legal status of weed to prohibition.....put down the bong.
weed at one time was completely illegal and classified as a schedule 1 drug..also still a schedule 1 drug
it's a perfectly fine comparison
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:18 pm to cas4t
quote:
I don't think so? I think there is a standard across the board, then schools can also enforce whatever they want.
current 1st and second strikes per NCAA.
quote:
Under Bylaw 18.4.1.5.1, the student-athlete becomes ineligible for all regular season and postseason competition until eligibility is reinstated by the NCAA student-athlete reinstatement staff on behalf of the committee.
quote:
If a student-athlete tests positive for the use of a “street drug” after having tested positive for use of any banned drug, he or she shall be charged with the loss of a minimum of one additional season of competition in all sports and shall remain ineligible for regular-season and postseason competition during the time period ending once calendar year (365 days).
Like I thought they really let the schools deal with it more than anything. Maybe they are relaxing the stringency of the non street drug rules. Which UGA fans know all too well with the player that just his eligibility back.
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:19 pm to arrakis
quote:
If you are equating the legal status of weed to prohibition.....put down the bong.
If you couldn't see the context of my post, pick up one.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:20 pm to NYCAuburn
wow, that's eye opening. The term "street drug" in such a professional context made me lol too.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:21 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
If you are equating the legal status of weed to prohibition.....put down the bong.
quote:
If you couldn't see the context of my post, pick up one.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:32 pm to RT1941
Double
Posted on 4/16/14 at 2:40 pm to skullopener
They're just little victims... it's not their fault they "experimented" peer pressure is tough.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News