Started By
Message
re: What team leads the conference in Total Offense in 2014?
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:33 pm to thirdlawson
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:33 pm to thirdlawson
quote:
Auburn Fan
You don't say....
Where does blind luck figure in to your equation?
2
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:37 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
Where does blind luck figure in to your equation?
Luck from last year only accounted for about 60 yards so probably very little.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:38 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
Where does blind luck figure in to your equation?
We have had no injuries by players that have caused blindness so none of course.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:50 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Mississippi State: 85% returning
47 offensive TDs in 2013
18 passing TDs (13 return)
18 receiving TDs (15 return)
29 rushing TDs (27 return)
Kentucky: 82% returning
30 offensive TDs in 2013
14 passing TDs (14 return)
14 receiving TDs (12 return)
16 rushing TDs (10 return)
Arkansas: 77% returning
29 offensive TDs in 2013
15 passing TDs (15 return)
15 receiving TDs (10 return)
14 rushing TDs (9 return)
Auburn: 72% returning
68 offensive TDs in 2013
20 passing TDs (20 return)
20 receiving TDs (18 return)
48 rushing TDs (25 return)
Tennessee: 71% returning
30 offensive TDs in 2013
12 passing TDs (12 return)
12 receiving TDs (12 return)*
18 rushing TDs (6 return)
*Assumes Pig Howard returns to the team
Ole Miss: 70% returning
46 offensive TDs in 2013
24 passing TDs (18 return)
24 receiving TDs (15 return)
22 rushing TDs (16 return)
Alabama: 58% returning
58 offensive TDs in 2013
30 passing TDs (2 return)
30 receiving TDs (22 return)
28 rushing TDs (27 return)
Florida: 56% returning
25 offensive TDs in 2013
11 passing TDs (5 return)
11 receiving TDs (4 return)
14 rushing TDs (11 return)
South Carolina: 54% returning
57 offensive TDs in 2013
30 passing TDs (5 return)
30 receiving TDs (21 return)
27 rushing TDs (21 return)
Georgia: 50% returning
57 offensive TDs in 2013
31 passing TDs (5 return)
31 receiving TDs (20 return)
26 rushing TDs (19 return)
Vanderbilt: 47% returning
49 offensive TDs in 2013
15 passing TDs (4 return)
15 receiving TDs (2 return)
34 rushing TDs (24 return)
Missouri: 44% returning
66 offensive TDs in 2013
31 passing TDs (12 return)
31 receiving TDs (16 return)
35 rushing TDs (15 return)
Texas A&M: 27% returning
73 offensive TDs in 2013
40 passing TDs (3 return)
40 receiving TDs (13 return)
33 rushing TDs (14 return)
LSU: 25% returning
60 offensive TDs in 2013
23 passing TDs (1 returns)
23 receiving TDs (3 return)
37 rushing TDs (17 return)
according to this lil' tidbit id say AUB, but im just a homer. so dont mind me
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:59 pm to All4Qtrs
quote:
we are good then. considering last time we were matched up...
Whos returning more play makers on O? (serious ?)
It's not as simple as who returns, for example, MU doesn't return it's starting QB but will be better w/ Matty Football Mauk, the depth/recruiting we have at the handful of positions that have starters leaving is really outstanding.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:01 pm to Jagd Tiger
this thread sucks
and a&m is the answer
and a&m is the answer
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:03 pm to thirdlawson
I CAN PLAY THIS GAME
This:
plus this:
plus this:
add in a little of this:
some of this:
a dash of this:
a bit of this:
a sprinkle of this:
also, if you aren't full of fricking wonderment we may as well throw this in as well:
This:
plus this:
plus this:
add in a little of this:
some of this:
a dash of this:
a bit of this:
a sprinkle of this:
also, if you aren't full of fricking wonderment we may as well throw this in as well:
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:05 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
Matty Football Mauk
ok back to business
it is when they are untested... they are a question mark and when making predictions you must remember:
1 its not real
2 never bet on improbabilities
3 examine the facts and remove personal opinions
i have based my "guess" off of returning starters and the proof they have brought to the table
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:05 pm to Jagd Tiger
I don't know where the net result will put us, but I expect Mauk to probably put up bigger numbers all the way around. That's INT's as well as Yds or TD's.
Running back? No drop off. We used 3 guys equally last year and return 2 of them. The new 3rd guy will fit right in.
Lose some at WR but if we were deep anywhere, with a 5* not seeing much time last year, it was at WR. Add to it, I bet Mauk and DGB have more chemistry than Franklin did and I don't think we fall off at WR.
On the line, we move a couple guys around, but all 5 played last year.
Running back? No drop off. We used 3 guys equally last year and return 2 of them. The new 3rd guy will fit right in.
Lose some at WR but if we were deep anywhere, with a 5* not seeing much time last year, it was at WR. Add to it, I bet Mauk and DGB have more chemistry than Franklin did and I don't think we fall off at WR.
On the line, we move a couple guys around, but all 5 played last year.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:05 pm to Manzielathon
quote:
a&m is the answer
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:06 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
Roper's
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:07 pm to All4Qtrs
quote:
LSU: 25% returning
60 offensive TDs in 2013
23 passing TDs (1 returns)
23 receiving TDs (3 return)
37 rushing TDs (17 return)
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:08 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
JuiceTerry
tDecline
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:09 pm to All4Qtrs
quote:
it is when they are untested... they are a question mark
Mauk was tested for awesomeness between the hedges and passed w/ flying colors...
that's the way it works... too!
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:10 pm to Jagd Tiger
Ole Miss, no question about it.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:16 pm to REBEL5 AC
Josey was way better than the rest of those backs. There will be some drop off. He carried you guys towards the end of last season
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:21 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
Mauk was tested for awesomeness between the hedges and passed w/ flying colors...
not solely focusing on Mauk
he had A LOT of help that wont be there next year
Mizzou is losing 50% of its receiving and 70% of its rushing.... tough to replace
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:32 pm to thirdlawson
Auburn's offense is so fricking stacked. I honestly can't see many teams, if any, stopping it.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:35 pm to All4Qtrs
quote:
Mizzou is losing 50% of its receiving and 70% of its rushing.... tough to replace
It really isn't though, because all of the WR replacement core, which is Sasser, Hunt and White are upper classemen w/ SEC game experience in which they played anywhere from good to spectacular.
Only 2 WR's have gone, Lucas and Washington, both good, but neither is a DGB. At TE we didn't do much so aren't in a position of having to replace a lot, but that's part of your so called 50%.
At RB, we lose a very good Josey, but return 2 of the 3 starters by committee in Hansbrough and Murphy and have some great young guys in the mix, so it's the least tested of the skill area's but still creates no real question marks.
Even if you're just gleaning stats, your info is just not really correct regarding what Mizzou has coming back for experienced players.
This post was edited on 4/7/14 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:45 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Maybe someone will finally unseat us as SEC offense king. I'm starting to feel bad for SEC defenses
Well, it evens out when you consider your defense.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News