Started By
Message

re: Texas Aggy Basketball - 2013/2014 edition

Posted on 4/14/14 at 4:03 pm to
Posted by ImperialPalace
Galveston, Texas
Member since Oct 2012
2888 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Texas A&M coach Billy Kennedy, in an effort to shake his program from mediocrity, has adjusted the top of his staff. Kennedy on Saturday said associate head coach Glynn Cyprien is no longer part of the program.

ISWYDT, Brent.

LINK
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

How is Avery Johnson Jr. so highly rated

dunno. I saw he was a mid-3 star on Scout. Hoops recruiting sites are pretty shitty and I just flipped between ESPN, Scout, and Maxpreps because each had some of our players missing. It's probably a poor effort on my part tbh. He's hardly a good recruit. He's just about what we've been getting.

Two things I've noticed about hoops recruiting - all the sites suck and all the sites have massive star inflation. There are 20 5-stars per year on scout. In football there are only 30 despite 7 times as many scholarships. The fact that we only have two 4-stars on our roster is pretty sad in that light. I'd guess there are several midmajors in the state of Texas alone with more (Houston, SMU for sure)
quote:

By my count, there are 13 scholarship players:

my mistake, was thinking there were only 11 spots and I didn't bother to count them
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58028 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 5:38 pm to
want a splash hire?

go hire Avery to coach his son HC following next season.

while his dictatorial style wears out its welcome quickly with NBA players, I could see it working really well in college.
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 5:39 pm
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:29 am to
Splash hires are:

1. Recent ex-NBA coaches

2. Recent greatly overachieving coaches, like one that takes a nobody program to a Sweet 16 the year before. Just making a tournament doesn't count, you have to overachieve when you get there.

3. Retread famous college coaches

Any of those will cost big money. As in the kind of money we aren't willing to spend right now.

But it will take that kind of hire to reboot the program and pull in the kind of talent needed to to compete in college basketball.

Until we are willing to make that kind of commitment, we are an also-ran. Might as well do that with BK and dump the rest into the sport we all care about more.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:34 am
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Two things I've noticed about hoops recruiting - all the sites suck and all the sites have massive star inflation. There are 20 5-stars per year on scout. In football there are only 30 despite 7 times as many scholarships.


Think about it though, that makes sense.

In college football, 5 stars are great players but the separation between a five star and even a three star isn't as great as in basketball.

With football, a few three stars can work together as a team (like our own JFF and Evans) and find a way to beat anyone. You will do better with more 5 star players overall, but three stars that fit your system can still be effective at a high level. You need to recruit at a high level in football to be effective, but that is more for depth through an entire season.

College basketball is much more like a caste system. If you don't have a shot at All American, one-and-done level players then you are just spinning your wheels. There is a very real ceiling where even the best of coaching and fundamentals can't overcome raw talent. You can't coach height.

You say our roster is sad with only two 4 stars, but that avoids the truth. The truth is that we are NOT a program is that considered a legitimate option for a blue chip recruit, and we have never been.

We can get a few every now and then, but even during the best of the BSG and Turg years our ceiling because of a lack of top shelf elite talent was obvious. When you watch the Final Four and the level of talent those teams have the difference is also obvious.

Now we are a step back from there, without the coaching and overachieving needed to get to our ceiling. But that ceiling was never championship-level even before BK.

To go further as a program we need to change the game. Just like the SEC move did for football, we need to do some sort of "YES WE EXIST! YES WE WILL COMPETE!!" statement with basketball.

What that means practically is overpaying the hell out of someone who is legitimately elite due to previous accomplishments. Someone that is such a big name that the hire stayes on ESPN.com and someone so big that his every move early on gets coverage.

So basically what SMU did.

Until we are willing to do that, our basketball program is basically a NIT-level program like 90+% of them. Which is fine and can be fun, but it would be nice if we could achieve more.

Programs that bluebloods wouldn't traditionally touch like Auburn and Va Tech grabbed for the brass ring this offseason. I hope that can be A&M one day...
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:55 am
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 11:50 am to
quote:

You say our roster is sad with only two 4 stars, but that avoids the truth. The truth is that we are NOT a program is that considered a legitimate option for a blue chip recruit, and we have never been.

I agree BCG and Turge didn't necessarily recruit well (BCG was picking up tremendously before he left though and Melvin was actually a good recruiter). But those guys weren't taking over programs with 6 straight NCAA appearances and frankly we invested a fair amount in facilities right after BCG left. So it's not apples to apples.

Anyway, we probably have the least 4* players of any school in the SEC. It's not just that we are recruiting poorly for a school without much fanbase or tradition, we're just recruiting poorly. There are obvious reasons and I'm not saying Cyprien's job was easy. It's hard to recruit the right guys under the shaky circumstances. But either way he didn't so it's not like we're losing anything.

As far as the money, that's really what it comes down to. Everyone seems to think we are loaded because of overwhelming capital donations. But those things have specific uses and simply aren't relevant. We've also added about $5m into ongoing OpEx for football since Sumlin's hiring (he's making $3m more than he started and I believe the asst pool is now up to $3.5m). Our Op Rev is expected to go up tremendously in the next few years. Some of that is going to be offset with interest payments but we should free up more room to spend as well. What really disappoints me about not hiring now is that it seems overly conservative. I'm certain they do projections and spending money now is, imo, a wise investment.

But the risk is there that if revenue doesn't increase as anticipated, our baseline OpEx could outstrip OpRev and we simply don't have the cash on hand to deal with that. And that's how ADs get fired so it's hardly surprising that an AD would take a conservative approach despite fan reaction. I think most of the histrionics are confounding. I'm not happy, but the situation is pretty apparent. If revenue comes in as expected from Kyle, from SECN, from Adidas, from a post-JFF licensing world, etc, we are likely looking at an entirely different situation a year from now. But there's a lot of uncertainty in our revenue situation atm.

And imo the firing of Cyprien is more a signal that the powers that be get it, even if they feel it's unwise financially to do anything about it just yet. If Kennedy had been given free reign to increase his asst budget, then we'd be throwing good money after bad. But he was essentially told your budget is your budget which suggests he's clearly on notice. Win with what you have.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79892 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 2:07 pm to
I guess we have to wait to ask the question on everyone's mind until the schedule is released:

Which shitty nonconference team will we get embarrassed by at home in the 2014-2015 season?
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10521 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 2:10 pm to
I guess we don't have to wait to ask the other question on everyone's mind:

How far will the Ags go in the NCAA tourney next year?
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 2:12 pm to
Not an elite opponent but definitely an interesting one. Looks like our schedule will at least be better next year
quote:

@HerbSendek
Sun Devil hoops team playing at Texas A&M and at Marquette December 2014. #schedule
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 3:31 pm to
tmc94, I am on the same page as you. In fact I appreciate how you have consistently explained this on the forum. We simply don't have the money to pimp out football and basketball, and I would rather Sumlin get paid then BK get his buyout.

But I do want to focus on one thing you said:

quote:

But those guys weren't taking over programs with 6 straight NCAA appearances and frankly we invested a fair amount in facilities right after BCG left.


When we were back in this period, I REALLY wanted us to take that step forward given our streak of sustained success.

That step forward, that leap, would have been hiring Buzz Williams at that point in time. He would have been the perfect coach to take us to the next level back then.

But then we cheaped out and hired Bk. And I will admit, the day his hire was announced I thought to myself "damn, we just went and wasted all that momentum to save some money." The day the diagnosis hit, I knew I was right. Bill destroyed the program he built by not outpaying Marquette.


But then you fast forward to this offseason, and I don't see the same obvious option. Pearl is too much of a risk for us, we don't usually touch guys like that. Buzz wasn't the answer this time, he could have built on our momentum but you need a bigger name to restart it from scratch.

There really was no single coach, no obvious hire, that could turn our program around. As low as we are in 2014, anything short of a ex-NBA guy with rings or at least big playoff wins won't do the job.

So given all that, I am fine with BK. No he isn't going to win a title, or honestly even elevate our program back to where it was when he was hired, but he will make sure basketball isn't sucking up money we need for Sumlin's salary or some facility upgrade.

For me the signal that the "powers that be" get it was when Sumlin got his above-market value contract. That was our chance to not make the same mistake Bill made with basketball and be cheap at the exact time when you need not to be.

Basketball can sit in the corner and fester and rot until our stadium is done and we have the revenue of 100k+ seats driving the athletic department. At that point we can afford a nationally known ex-NBA guy at around $3 mil a year that will get our program out of the gutter.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 3:33 pm
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 3:34 pm to
Damn, I suck with my novels in this thread. I am the R. Duke of Aggie basketball. Sorry tmc94
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 4:17 pm to
no worries. It can be hard to express an opinion in a cheap witty comment sometimes

I agree I hated the Kennedy hire but I also wasn't a particularly big Turgeon fan so I was just happy to be rid of him before the bottom fell out (which I'm pretty sure it would have). Both have primary problems that I think made them bad fits for A&M - they lack dynamic personalities.

We don't support hoops well. We need someone who wants to build that through style of play or force of personality. Turgeon's incessant whining really got to me when the product he put on the court was all kinds of boring. Kennedy followed that up with another boring style.

Flat out, A&M needs an entertaining style or you better win fast. BCG's group not only won, they were entertaining. The players gave maximum effort and our fans appreciated that. The last few years, our players seem more finesse. They aren't the hard-nosed Kirks or Pompeys or Walkers that you just have to root for and get you pumped up by competing harder than anyone else. And that's fine if you win. But if you play a boring style with boring players you get bored fans. It's just where we are.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

But if you play a boring style with boring players you get bored fans. It's just where we are.



Good point.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 6:16 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79892 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Basketball can sit in the corner and fester and rot until our stadium is done and we have the revenue of 100k+ seats driving the athletic department. At that point we can afford a nationally known ex-NBA guy at around $3 mil a year that will get our program out of the gutter.


At that point it will be too late. Unlike when Melvin's 0-16 season got him fired, we have the potential to get decimated by APR as a result of the number of players that Kennedy has run off over the last couple of years.

Even if you take out Reese:

Jamal Branch (left for SJU)
Naji Hibbert (transferred out)
Keith Davis (quit)
Daniel Alexander (transferred out)
Andrew Young (transferred out)
Shawn Smith (left the team)

6 players in 3 seasons is more than the usual attrition.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79892 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

I am the R. Duke of Aggie basketball. Sorry tmc94


No, more like Aggressor. You don't have the Billy Madison-like lack of coherent thoughts that Duke had.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

we have the potential to get decimated by APR as a result of the number of players that Kennedy has run off over the last couple of years.


I would think the major attrition is over for the same reason none of the non-tu Big 12 teams will leave that conference. That almost seems like a reason to keep him a year or two, so we don't go through that again potentially.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79892 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

That almost seems like a reason to keep him a year or two, so we don't go through that again potentially.


Scholarship players leaving/quitting/transferring under Gillispie:

Luis Clemente
David Devezin
Kenneth White
Martellus Bennett (to concentrate on football)

Scholarship player attrition under Turgeon:

Denzel Bowles
Jeremy Adams
James Blaczyk
DeAndre Jordan (NBA)

Kennedy has DOUBLED that in less time.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 7:11 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
144961 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 5:11 pm to
Just hired a new assistant. Amir abdur rahim
Posted by WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
Member since Jan 2013
13839 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

Just hired a new assistant. Amir abdur rahim


Aggie Sports article

Apparently the offense of the team he coached at was #300 in offensive officiency and he is a former BK player. More of the same.
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 4/18/14 at 11:43 am to
This program.











But really...











But really...











But really...


first pageprev pagePage 24 of 28Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter