Started By
Message

Why are Texas recruits so coveted?
Posted on 5/20/13 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 5:54 pm
It may be different for other teams, but lately it seems like Arkansas' in-state talent has been head and shoulders above the Texas recruits coming in.
Darren McFadden - Arkansas
Peyton Hillis - Arkansas
Joe Adams - Arkansas
Greg Childs - Arkansas
Jarius Wright - Arkansas
Jake Bequette - Arkansas
Jamaal Anderson - Arkansas
Marcus Harrison - Arkansas
Jerry Franklin - Arkansas
Tyler Wilson - Arkansas
Shawn Andrews - Arkansas
Marcus Monk - Arkansas
Matt Jones - Arkansas
Jonathan Luigs - Arkansas
Cedric Cobbs - Arkansas
Knile Davis - Texas
Tony Ugoh - Texas
Chris Houston - Texas
Caleb Miller - Texas
I'm putting Texarkana players in a separate category:
Cobi Hamilton - Texas
Dennis Johnson - Arkansas
Ryan Mallett - (finished high school in Texas, but from Arkansas)
Is Texas high school overrated due to its publicity and reputation or is Arkansas in-state talent that underrated?
Darren McFadden - Arkansas
Peyton Hillis - Arkansas
Joe Adams - Arkansas
Greg Childs - Arkansas
Jarius Wright - Arkansas
Jake Bequette - Arkansas
Jamaal Anderson - Arkansas
Marcus Harrison - Arkansas
Jerry Franklin - Arkansas
Tyler Wilson - Arkansas
Shawn Andrews - Arkansas
Marcus Monk - Arkansas
Matt Jones - Arkansas
Jonathan Luigs - Arkansas
Cedric Cobbs - Arkansas
Knile Davis - Texas
Tony Ugoh - Texas
Chris Houston - Texas
Caleb Miller - Texas
I'm putting Texarkana players in a separate category:
Cobi Hamilton - Texas
Dennis Johnson - Arkansas
Ryan Mallett - (finished high school in Texas, but from Arkansas)
Is Texas high school overrated due to its publicity and reputation or is Arkansas in-state talent that underrated?
Posted on 5/20/13 at 5:57 pm to Drewbie
or maybe the great ones dont go to Arkansas? I dont see the basis of this post
Posted on 5/20/13 at 5:57 pm to Drewbie
I liked the point Urban Meyer had when he was on espn a few years ago. He said Texas players tend to be more polished because of the quality of coaching they receive at the high school level, while Florida players tend to be raw but very athletic and more talented. I found that interesting, even though it isn't very relevant to your post 
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:00 pm to redwingtiger
Southern Alabama and Florida > Texas
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:01 pm to crankbait
quote:Has nothing to do with going to Arkansas or not. Just used Arkansas as an example. Arkansas had the #1 rated wide receiving core in the entire nation. 3 of them were from Arkansas, one was from Texarkana. in '06-07 Arkansas had the most talented backfield in the conference along with one of the best running backs to ever play in the SEC. All three of them were from Arkansas. For the past 5 years Arkansas' starting QB has been the best in the conference and within the top 5 in the nation. Both from Arkansas.
or maybe the great ones dont go to Arkansas? I dont see the basis of this post
You don't see very many "All-Texas" squads like that capable of performing to the level of those groups.
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:02 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
Southern Alabama and Florida > Texas
Also Georgia. All of our Georgia/Florida recruits seem to end up being studs.
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:03 pm to Drewbie
quote:
For the past 5 years Arkansas' starting QB has been the best in the conference.
umm...
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:03 pm to Drewbie
quote:
For the past 5 years Arkansas' starting QB has been the best in the conference
Pump the brakes
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:04 pm to Drewbie
Hypothetically, if Arkansas could cherry pick any in-state kids they wanted and never lost Arkansas kids to their neighbors, you could probably field a pretty competitive football team made up of nothing but Arkansas kids. But the state doesn't have enough talent to feed more than 1 perennial top 15-25ish team. If you lose even a few of your in state targets to Bama/A&M/LSU, etc, you have no choice but to hope for the best in other states to fill the void.
Texas has enough talent to field 2 elite level college football teams and 3-4 top 15-25ish teams. Usually that means 2 of A&M/OU/UTex are top 10 teams with almost all Texas talent, while the one left out is a notch down. Then you've got Baylor/TCU/TT/OSU also feeding almost exclusively off of Texas talent, and while not considered mainstays in the top 10, they've all had 10+ win seasons in the last 5-6 years.
We've had more in common with that bottom group that OU and UTex for most of the last 15 years, but since Sumlin's arrival and the conference change I think OU is becoming the odd man out, and has to hope for overachieving with lesser talent like OSU/TT/Baylor have done at times.
Texas has enough talent to field 2 elite level college football teams and 3-4 top 15-25ish teams. Usually that means 2 of A&M/OU/UTex are top 10 teams with almost all Texas talent, while the one left out is a notch down. Then you've got Baylor/TCU/TT/OSU also feeding almost exclusively off of Texas talent, and while not considered mainstays in the top 10, they've all had 10+ win seasons in the last 5-6 years.
We've had more in common with that bottom group that OU and UTex for most of the last 15 years, but since Sumlin's arrival and the conference change I think OU is becoming the odd man out, and has to hope for overachieving with lesser talent like OSU/TT/Baylor have done at times.
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:04 pm to sarc
quote:Who was better than Mallett or Wilson the last 5 years?
Pump the breaks
ETA: If I see Bray or Murray I won't even bother with a response.
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:04 pm to Drewbie
Texas offensive players should be coveted, especially QBs.
If you want D-Lineman then you need to look to the original SEC footprint.
And FL is best for speed. Especially DBs.
If you want D-Lineman then you need to look to the original SEC footprint.
And FL is best for speed. Especially DBs.
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:05 pm to stevo1905
quote:
I liked the point Urban Meyer had when he was on espn a few years ago. He said Texas players tend to be more polished because of the quality of coaching they receive at the high school level, while Florida players tend to be raw but very athletic and more talented. I found that interesting, even though it isn't very relevant to your post
Actually it is, Florida players have more potential/higher ceilings, while many Texas players do not pan out or reach "projections" as many have peaked in HS.
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:06 pm to Drewbie
Well, there have been a couple Heisman winning QBs from the SEC during that stretch
Or are you saying that Arky has had the best 5 year stretch at the QB position in the SEC? I'd be inclined to agree with that.
Or are you saying that Arky has had the best 5 year stretch at the QB position in the SEC? I'd be inclined to agree with that.
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:06 pm to Drewbie
Tebow, Cam, Manziel, Murray, McCaron
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:07 pm to Drewbie
Tim Tebow
Cam Newton
AJ
Manziel
Murray
Cam Newton
AJ
Manziel
Murray
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:07 pm to UMRealist
quote:Just...no
Tebow
quote:Forgot him.
Cam
quote:
Manziel, Murray, McCaron
All three of these QB's had lines that could give them all day to throw and Wilson still had better stats than 2/3 with absolutely no protection at all.
This post was edited on 5/20/13 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:08 pm to Drewbie
quote:
Tebow Just...no
LoLwut?
Posted on 5/20/13 at 6:09 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Actually it is, Florida players have more potential/higher ceilings, while many Texas players do not pan out or reach "projections" as many have peaked in HS.
How many NFL players are from tx? How many tx kids are college all-Americans?
Popular
Back to top


19







