Started By
Message
Wonder how many teams are going to run No-Huddle Spread Offense in 2013
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:42 pm
Watching the Texas Longhorns Spring game and they suck at it!!! Seems to me, you need a running QB to get away with that type of offensive strategy..
This post was edited on 3/30/13 at 7:16 pm
9
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:50 pm to jrevonte
quote:
No-Huddle
quote:
Spread Offense
quote:
Seems to me, you need a running QB to get away with that type of offensive strategy..
Good thing you don't know what you're talking about, then.
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:51 pm to TheSandman
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:53 pm to jrevonte
You can have a balanced QB, you just need a coach not named Mack Brown.
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:54 pm to TheSandman
quote:
Good thing you don't know what you're talking about, then.
For fricking real...
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:57 pm to McKeezy
Wait VT and Auburn are you kidding me! 
Posted on 3/30/13 at 6:59 pm to geauxrebs
quote:
You can have a balanced QB
You don't even need a balanced QB - a pocket passer can execute a spread offense just fine.
The thing is, a dual-threat quarterback will give any offense an extra dimension, and the kinds of offensive coordinators that are moving to spread offenses are generally going to be more open to using a quarterback's talents on the ground.
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:00 pm to jrevonte
quote:
Wait VT and Auburn are you kidding me!
Swing and a miss. Nice misuse of gratuitous amounts of laughing emoticons.
Try not deflecting from the issue at hand next time.
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:02 pm to TheSandman
quote:
You don't even need a balanced QB - a pocket passer can execute a spread offense just fine.
Problem that I'm seeing is that the "D" is keying on the Rb with pure pocket passer...if QB can pull and run then defense has to respect fake of dual threat thereby leaving a running lane for back
This post was edited on 3/30/13 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:02 pm to TheSandman
quote:The OP's son is already more succesful than you will ever be.
TheSandman
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:02 pm to jrevonte
quote:
Problem that I'm seeing is that the "D" is keying on the Rb with pure pocket passer...if QB can pull and run then defense has to respect fake leaving a running lane for back
How is this any less true for a more "traditional" offense?
ETA: And what the hell does this have to do with the tempo at which it is executed?
This post was edited on 3/30/13 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:05 pm to tgr4ever
quote:
The OP's son is already more succesful than you will ever be.
Cool story, bro
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:05 pm to TheSandman
quote:
How is this any less true for a more "traditional" offense?
I think we're talking about the ineffectiveness of no-huddle spread offense with a pure pocket passer?
Defense disregards tempo if all they have to do is crash the gaps to take away inside handoff...without a dual threat QB defense can lock on receivers or at very least play a more aggressive defense
This post was edited on 3/30/13 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:08 pm to jrevonte
OP Doesn't know the difference between Spread Offense and Spread Option Offense.
Sam Bradford led the most prolific offense in NCAA history running the spread and he can't run for shite.
Sam Bradford led the most prolific offense in NCAA history running the spread and he can't run for shite.
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:10 pm to jrevonte
quote:
I think we're talking about the ineffectiveness of no-huddle spread offense with a pure pocket passer?
That's correct.
You said that a running quarterback is needed in a HUNH spread because it opens lanes up for the running back, since the defense is having to respect the running ability of the quarterback.
My question is, why is this exclusive to a spread offense? In a "traditional" offense, the defense isn't having to account for the quarterback running, allowing them to key in on the running back. Yet they seem to rack up rushing yards just fine.
This post was edited on 3/30/13 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:17 pm to jrevonte
quote:
Defense disregards tempo if all they have to do is crash the gaps to take away inside handoff...without a dual threat QB defense can lock on receivers or at very least play a more aggressive defense
So you're going send enough men at and around the offensive line to take away the entire run game, while at the same time locking down every single one of the high number of receivers that a spread employs.
Either you're working with Nick Saban-like talent at every single position, or you're running the Derek Dooley 4-5-4 defense.
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:18 pm to jrevonte
quote:
Watching the Texas Longhorns Spring game
Is this televised?
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:18 pm to tgr4ever
We don't care about his son. We should all bow to a recruits father. 
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:21 pm to TheSandman
I don't think I said it was exclusive to the spread offense (or spread option), I think that is your statement
Posted on 3/30/13 at 7:22 pm to chalupa
quote:
Is this televised?
We are at the game
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News