Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:53 pm to theGarnetWay
Considering we lead the all time series, no
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:53 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
Considering we lead the all time series, no
Partying like it's 1979, eh?
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:54 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
Considering we lead the all time series, no
You can have the 4-game series lead. We'll take the 2 national titles and the Omaha victories.
eta: Every last Arky fan on here knows they would give SC a 4-game series lead if it meant exchanging those 2 losses last year in Omaha for a shot at the title.
This post was edited on 2/18/13 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:54 pm to therick711
What does 1979 have to do with anything?
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:56 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
What does 1979 have to do with anything?
It was the only time the Hogs left the CWS with a winning record.
#11-14
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:56 pm to theGarnetWay
Again, what is your point of us playing you in Omaha? Arkansas vs. USCe in Omaha is 3-3
Am I missing something? It's not like us meeting LSU in Omaha, where we've never beaten them there.
Am I missing something? It's not like us meeting LSU in Omaha, where we've never beaten them there.
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:57 pm to Hawgeye
I was just asking if you were going to party like it is '79? I guess the answer is "no."
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:06 pm to therick711
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:07 pm to Broski
Isn't that the poll that's one year old or something?
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:08 pm to I Ham That I Ham
Still a poll breh...just posting it in the poll thread.
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:14 pm to lsu711
So my revolutionary theory that if you lose a game (or games) you fall in the polls......... has been validated?
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:18 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
So my revolutionary theory that if you lose a game (or games) you fall in the polls......... has been validated?
Did you glean that from all the polls in which we didn't fall?
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:25 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Did you glean that from all the polls in which we didn't fall?
It's a working theory therefore, this "gleaning" is outside my sphere of knowledge.
However, I have also noticed that any team that lost did not move higher in any polls.
I only seek the truth.
This post was edited on 2/18/13 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:25 pm to theGarnetWay
For South Carolina...it was so cold...oh so cold.
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:26 pm to bishop
You know you're tFlagship when your conferences foes fap to you going from #1 to #2.
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:28 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
I have also noticed that any team that lost did not move higher in any polls.
Can't get insight like this anywhere else on the internet.
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:50 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:We wouldn't have to trade them for wins. We'd just trade them for an ump that doesn't clearly hate Arkansas and win the games on superior talent.
eta: Every last Arky fan on here knows they would give SC a 4-game series lead if it meant exchanging those 2 losses last year in Omaha for a shot at the title.
Posted on 2/18/13 at 2:07 pm to Drewbie
They axed your thread before you even had time to call the pigs earlier, brah!
Posted on 2/18/13 at 2:14 pm to lsu711
WIU made a decent case for #2. 99.9% of the other teams in the cou try would have been swept even though we started 5 freshman and a midweek reliever on Sunday. Have to get those guys experience early.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News