Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:29 pm to LOCO5150
The rest of the Au team had 1575 yards rushing on 321 attempts for a 4.9 yard per carry average, Bo had a 6.4 ypc average and 1786 yds on 278 carries. They were a running offense to say the least. Tailored for a RB.
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:30 pm to Swoopin
I could. But don't care to. 
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:37 pm to TTsTowel
Ingram
Walker
Tebow
Bo
Peyton Manning
Cam
Walker
Tebow
Bo
Peyton Manning
Cam
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:41 pm to Alahunter
quote:He was. 148.8 yds per game rushing to Ingram's 118.4.
You're right, Bo should have been much better running the ball.
In a different offensive era.
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:41 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Peyton Manning
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:45 pm to Alahunter
Well this is called the SEC rant, and im damn sure about to. Im taking time out of my busy schedule to educate you ratards, so liten up. Herschel was UGA when he was there. There was absolutely no offensive talent around him. In the 1980 championship Buck Belue completed 1 pass, one! Herschel had 36 carries 150 yards and 2 touchdowns. He averaged 159 yards per game for his career. Each season was 11the games long, not 12 and no SEC title games. 33-3 career record. 5259 yards in 3 years. No redshirt year. If I am not mistaken Herschel didnt have a loss to louisianna monroe on the resume either. 220 lbs running a 9.9 100. Enjoy yoself! 
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:48 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Ingram
Walker
Tebow
Bo
Peyton Manning
Cam
The discussion is Heisman winners, not Citrus Bowl MVPs.
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:49 pm to USMC Gators
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:54 pm to WDE24
quote:
In a different offensive era.
Yah. He did it in a run based offense.
Bo 276 carries his Heisman yr for 1786 yds and 17 TD's 6.4 ypc
Ingram 271 carries his Heisman yr for 1658 yds and 17 TD's 6.1 ypc
Not that much difference to be in a catered to offense that Bo had. Then figure in plays and yards from scrimmage, and Ingram had the same 6.6 yards per play, but more TD's and more yards. And I do factor those, because the Heisman is about best player. Make a Doak Walker best of thread if you want to use only running numbers.
This post was edited on 4/24/12 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:55 pm to orangehater
That's all fine and dandy, but we're not discussing NC years. We're discussing Heisman yrs. 
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:57 pm to TreyAnastasio
Fishing, posting pictures on non-SEC Heisman winners, and posting names of non-Heisman winners all on the same page...
You're on a roll.
You're on a roll.
Posted on 4/24/12 at 2:58 pm to Alahunter
quote:You say Bo was more catered to and then post stats of Ingram having more touches. Can you be any less logical?
catered to offense that Bo had.
Then you talk about more TDs and more yards without factoring in more games played.
quote:I responded to a post where you mentioned he should have had better rushing numbers than Ingram. Try to keep up. I know it is hard when you are being illogical, but you have shown the ability to remain steadfast in your ignorance in the past and I don't expect you to slack off now.
Make a Doak Walker best of thread if you want to use only running numbers.
You also act like stats are the only thing that matters, but then ignore the fact that, if that is the case, you validate the argument that Ingram didn't deserve the Heisman in the first place.
This post was edited on 4/24/12 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 4/24/12 at 3:00 pm to WDE24
quote:
You say Bo was more catered to and then post stats of Ingram having more touches. Can you be any less logical?
You act like 85 Auburn was this monolithic offense. Au ran the ball over 300 times besides Bo's 271 times. You don't think that wears down defenses and gives him an advantage in padded stats towards the end of games?
If you want to use straw arguments to discount Ingram, then live with the same in discrediting Bo's numbers.
quote:
Then you talk about more TDs and more yards without factoring in more games played.
Touches were very close to the same.
Posted on 4/24/12 at 3:03 pm to Alahunter
quote:What straw argument did I use? Please make sure you understand context when you answer.
If you want to use straw arguments to discount Ingram
I assume you think Toby Gerheart should have won the Heisman over Ingram. :herecomesthelogicalgymnastics:
Posted on 4/24/12 at 3:03 pm to WDE24
quote:
you validate the argument that Ingram didn't deserve the Heisman in the first place.
did nothing of the sort, unless you realize think Bo's numbers are that much lesser than and he's not deserving. I just ranked em.
Posted on 4/24/12 at 3:03 pm to WDE24
Ingram had more yards than he did.
Posted on 4/24/12 at 3:05 pm to Alahunter
quote:At the time of the Heisman voting he had fewer yards and 1 more game. You lose again.
Ingram had more yards than he did.
quote:
Toby Gerheart : (12 Games)
Total Yards – 1885
Total TD’s – 26
Rush Stats – 311 Carries, 1736 Yds, 5.6 Avg, and 26 TD’s
Receiving Stats – 10 Rec. 149 Yds. 14.9 Avg.
Century Games – 10
Double Century Games – 3
Multiple TD Games – 9
3 or more TD Games – 5
Mark Ingram: (13 Games)
Total Yards – 1864
Total TD’s – 18
Rush Stats – 249 Carries, 1542 Yds, 6.2 Avg, and 15 TD’s
Receiving Stats – 30 Rec. 322 Yds. 10.7 Avg and 3 TD’s.
Century Games – 8
Double Century Games – 1
Multiple TD Games – 7
3 or more TD Games – 1
This post was edited on 4/24/12 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 4/24/12 at 3:06 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Ingram 271 carries his Heisman yr for 1658 yds and 17 TD's 6.6 ypc
In two more games.
They're running backs, they one the trophy as such. Try not cherry-picking stats to make him look more impressive.
Ingram: 6.1 ypc
Jackson: 6.4 ypc
Walker: 4.9 ypc
using yfs ypc instead of rushing ypc.Posted on 4/24/12 at 3:09 pm to LOCO5150
Not sure if this has been said yet, but here we go.
Ingram wasn't even the best back in the state.
Ingram wasn't even the best back in the state.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News