re: Regarding expectations for Mett

quote:

---

That jefferson as a game manager got me. Jefferson is not and will not ever be a game manager. Mett is better right now than either of the other two. This D-1 crap is getting tiresome. You guys act like Mett is some guy straight out of high school. You know this isnt the case.

---

I agree, if he was a game manager we would have been undefeated last year. He is what I would refer to as a "game mis-manager". (Yes that's cheesy)

And you'll have to excuse them about Mett, they heard someone else use the argument in one of the 1,000 threads on the topic and can not come up with anything else to say but "he has not taken a D1 snap".

I do however think that Miles will start JJ unless Mett is just leaps and bounds ahead of him in fall practice but I certainly would feel more comfortable giving someone new a chance. I don't think these people realize, but what do we have to lose besides half-arse mediocre play from JJ?

Yes I understand we have a chance to go undefeated and you will probably argue that we have that to lose by playing Mett, but come on your delusional if you really think the QB play could be any worse if we played Mett?

And yes he's a savior to me or any of the other QBs, if they can just be an average to slightly above-average QB in the SEC.

I would just like to see someone new get a chance, doesn't have to Mett. I would even be okay with one of the other 2 new guys getting a chance but Mett clearly has more experience than those 2.