- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:57 am to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:57 am to L S Usetheforce
Directly from your article:
When are you going to shut the frick up? It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule. No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”. He wasn’t interfering with the play buddy, get over it.
quote:
Finally, not only must the runner be running illegally, but also he must interfere. A runner who runs up the grass to 1st base (illegal), but doesn’t interfere with the fielder receiving the ball at 1st is NOT guilty of Runner’s Lane Interference
When are you going to shut the frick up? It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule. No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”. He wasn’t interfering with the play buddy, get over it.
3
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:59 am to Forever
quote:
However, in the College World Series play the runner did contact the 1st baseman causing him to drop the ball
You forgot this part. He ran illegally and made contact with our 1st baseman. Easy out in Omaha
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 8:00 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:38 am to Forever
They never are. Our baseball fans are insane! Excuses out the arse for everything.
Posted on 5/11/24 at 11:07 am to Forever
quote:
When are you going to shut the frick up?
Why don't you STFU!
quote:
It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule.
Well, that is easy to disprove since rule was provided on here several times over the years and there has been CWS finals decided on plays that similar.
quote:It's not my fault you can't understand what you're seeing. You fkn people trip me out. You're right though, people with a full brain can see and comprehend what they are seeing. Thanks for admitting and proving the point. Wow, you fkn idiot!
No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”.
They should have never been in that situation but they were and nobody knows but Al and Bear if the kid illegally running inside the batter-runner path effected them fielding the ball at 1st or not. But the rule doesn't say ask them and find out. It says if the batter-runner does then it's interference. Should be as simple as that, even for you.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News