Started By
Message

re: This is why the tornado grading scale needs to be changed…

Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:18 am to
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
13495 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:18 am to
They have gone too far with the “radar indicated” and “debris fields”. I watched the news one night tell me a “radar confirmed” tornado was passing right over my buddies shop. Didn’t even blow the lid off the trash can.

They are crying wolf too much.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164339 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:51 am to
quote:

They have gone too far with the “radar indicated” and “debris fields”. I watched the news one night tell me a “radar confirmed” tornado was passing right over my buddies shop. Didn’t even blow the lid off the trash can.

They are crying wolf too much.

Ignorance is bliss
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54760 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 11:26 am to
quote:

They have gone too far with the “radar indicated” and “debris fields”. I watched the news one night tell me a “radar confirmed” tornado was passing right over my buddies shop. Didn’t even blow the lid off the trash can.

They are crying wolf too much.

The issue here has nothing to do with whether or not this was a tornado. It was 100% a tornado that was verified and tracked via radar. Damage was found right where then radar showed the tornado. I think the only improvement we have to make in regards to debris on radar is continuing to develop an understanding of how the tornado debris signature on radar correlates to the actual tornado. But I don't think that necessarily matters as far as public messaging goes. A tornado is a tornado is tornado when warning the public.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram