- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Rust" armorer Hannah Gutierrez was given the maximum sentence of 18 months in prison
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:29 am to Diamondawg
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:29 am to Diamondawg
quote:
Not at the time he pointed a real gun at an innocent bystander and pulled the trigger on said real gun. So had some other person that was not an actor had done this, they would be responsible? That's nonsense.
Baldwin’s PR team has done a masterful job convincing the masses that there is some sort of special actor’s court that absolves them from responsibility when they commit a crime.
That is 100% false. All activities on a movie set must comply with the laws of the jurisdiction they operate in. It’s just like any other job site.
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:40 am to BradBallard
quote:The case against Baldwin one is one for “negligent homicide.“ It is not a matter of having a “special rule“ for actors, but rather an examination of the definition of “negligence.”
Baldwin’s PR team has done a masterful job convincing the masses that there is some sort of special actor’s court that absolves them from responsibility when they commit a crime.
That is 100% false. All activities on a movie set must comply with the laws of the jurisdiction they operate in. It’s just like any other job site.
From time immemorial, reasonable reliance has been a de facto defense to negligence. the argument is that it is entirely “reasonable“ for an actor to rely upon the expertise of someone who has been retained and paid to assure the safe use of firearms on the set, just like it is entirely reasonable for you to trust your auto mechanic to properly change your brake pads (without crawling under the car yourself, to check his work).
Whether that reliance was indeed “reasonable” is the matter that will be assessed at trial.
This post was edited on 4/16/24 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 4/16/24 at 1:24 pm to BradBallard
quote:
Baldwin’s PR team has done a masterful job convincing the masses that there is some sort of special actor’s court that absolves them from responsibility when they commit a crime.
That is 100% false. All activities on a movie set must comply with the laws of the jurisdiction they operate in. It’s just like any other job site.
Pretty sure the guy that accidentally shot and killed Branon Lee on set was never charged with anything
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News