quote:
quote:
% of registered voters who voted

91.8% in 2020
87.2% in 2016
86.7% in 2012
89.6% in 2008

Well, so much for the premise of this thread.

It is more important where these additional voters voted. Even based on 2008 Black Jesus turnout there were an additional 2.2% of registered voters voting which would be more than enough to swing the results.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by DisplacedBuckeye

Member since Dec 2013

72675 posts

Posted on 4/12/24 at 7:43 am to lazlodawg

quote:
It is more important where these additional voters voted. Even based on 2008 Black Jesus turnout there were an additional 2.2% of registered voters voting which would be more than enough to swing the results.

Well, yeah.

That's...how elections work.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by JoeHackett

Member since Aug 2016

4360 posts

Posted on 4/12/24 at 11:09 am to lazlodawg

quote:
It is more important where these additional voters voted.

In all 50 states. Kinda blows up the narrative that only fraud could lead to an increase in turnout unless you believe that Democrats cheated in every single state.

200,000 more people voted in Alabama. Biden improved on Hillary's total by 120,000 votes. Trump improved by 123,000.

400,000 more people voted in S. Carolina. Biden improved on Hillary's total by 236,000 votes. Trump improved by 229,000.

370,000 more people voted in Oregon. Biden improved on Hillary's total by 338,000 votes. Trump improved by 176,000.

52,000 more people voted in S. Dakota. Biden improved on Hillary's total by 33,000 votes. Trump improved by 33,000.

50,000 more people voted in Vermont. Biden improved on Hillary's total by 64,000 votes. Trump improved by 17,000.

I could list all 50 states and the story would be exactly the same. Turnout was up everywhere and fewer people voted 3rd party. Taking a single data point (a higher % of registered voters voted) and thinking it proves fraud is either dumb or misleading.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board