- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alabama IVF ruling
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:34 pm to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:34 pm to NYNolaguy1
The difference is that most pills prevent fertilization rather than implementation.
It seems IVF is lab induced fertilization and then implementation. The embryo being created via fertilization and frozen before implementation.
The life begins at fertilization v. implementation is where this is likely going.
It seems IVF is lab induced fertilization and then implementation. The embryo being created via fertilization and frozen before implementation.
The life begins at fertilization v. implementation is where this is likely going.
1
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:51 pm to mr bojangles
quote:
The difference is that most pills prevent fertilization rather than implementation.
It seems IVF is lab induced fertilization and then implementation. The embryo being created via fertilization and frozen before implementation.
The life begins at fertilization v. implementation is where this is likely going.
IVF is taking embryos(fertilized eggs) and implanting them them into a uterus. The case here was talking about what happens to an IVF facility in the event these unimplanted eggs die due to negligence or outright disposal/murder.
If an IVF facility can be sued for the disposal/death of unimplanted embryos, why can't a mother when an unimplanted embryo falls out of the uterus and dies due to birth control?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News