Started By
Message

re: Breaking: Comer announces they have found $200,000.00 DIRECT payment to Joe Biden

Posted on 11/1/23 at 6:48 am to
Posted by Lawricks33
Member since May 2019
113 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 6:48 am to
I'll ask slowly for the mouth breathers. What is the check for?????? A loan between family members? You might not loan family that kind of money but you don't have that kind of money. I would love if politicians were exposed for corruption but this is not evidence folks
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
4484 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 8:12 am to
quote:

I'll ask slowly for the mouth breathers. What is the check for?????? A loan between family members? You might not loan family that kind of money but you don't have that kind of money. I would love if politicians were exposed for corruption but this is not evidence folks


You are being willfully ignorant and pretending not to know ….

This post was edited on 11/1/23 at 8:13 am
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24785 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 8:50 am to
quote:

I would love if politicians were exposed for corruption but this is not evidence folks



But it is:

Comer finds evidence of direct payment for $200K

"On March 1, 2018, Americore wired a $200,000 loan into James and Sara Biden’s personal bank account—not their business bank account," he continued. "And then, on the very same day, James Biden wrote a $200,000 check from this same personal bank account to Joe Biden."

It is illegal for Joe Biden to take money directly, but it is not illegal for his brother to do it. But if his brother just takes the money and gives it to Joe, it is illegal.

170+ Suspicious activity reports - NOT EVIDENCE
Form 1023 states Joe and Hunter were paid to fire prosectutor - NOT EVIDENCE
20+ shell companies hiding transfer of money to Biden Family - NOT EVIDENCE
Joe Biden on camera saying he would withhold $1B unless prosecutor is fired - NOT EVIDENCE
Various Biden Family members paid millions from foreign governments for no - NOT EVIDENCE
Multiple business partners state that Joe was involved in the business - NOT EVIDENCE


At some point, don't you actually have to take the totality of the "NOT EVIDENCE" and say that, "Hey, maybe something is going on here and we should have a real investigation by real investigators and not the house committee."

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram