Started By
Message
Under Armour or Adidas
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:33 am
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:33 am
JGT: We're hearing that Auburn has listened to multiple overtures from both Under Armour and adidas during the past several months.
He did not mention Nike. Contract ends in spring 2016.
IMHO: we need to stay with UA. Opinions?
He did not mention Nike. Contract ends in spring 2016.
IMHO: we need to stay with UA. Opinions?
16
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:39 am to allin2010
Under Armour is likely trying to flex some muscle in negotiations since they don't "need" us like previously
We likely are
right back.
We won't switch to Adidas unless they break the bank and their child's piggy bank too
We likely are
right back. We won't switch to Adidas unless they break the bank and their child's piggy bank too
This post was edited on 8/18/15 at 7:40 am
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:40 am to allin2010
Without a question we want to stay with Under Armour
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:40 am to allin2010
Nike
Under Armour
Puma
Reebok
Flip Flops
Adidas
If we change to Adidas, I will start wearing a wife beater to the games
Under Armour
Puma
Reebok
Flip Flops
Adidas
If we change to Adidas, I will start wearing a wife beater to the games
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:45 am to LanierSpots
Meh Adidas wouldn't be that bad as long as we can keep them somewhat accountable for what they design
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:46 am to allin2010
Under Armour. You will soon know why. 
Posted on 8/18/15 at 7:46 am to GenesChin
quote:
Under Armour is likely trying to flex some muscle in negotiations since they don't "need" us like previously
Bookmarked.
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:21 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
If we change to Adidas, I will start wearing a wife beater to the games
This.
Adidas is awful unless you like looking like an HBC.
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:26 am to allin2010
quote:
Adidas
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:30 am to allin2010
Does this mean I will get to break out my old addidas jackets?
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:30 am to allin2010
frick Adidas. They are awful.
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:37 am to NYCAuburn
Did you have the pants to go with it? Haha. I wanted them but my parents would not buy them for me.
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:43 am to LanierSpots
Russell > Adidas
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:48 am to Spiggly
Adidas was a bargaining chip. UA can not afford to lose us. We are in the premier conference in the nation. Only USCe wears UA in our conference. USCe, meh. No major team in the south wears UA except us and USCe. We have won one NC and played for another wearing UA. We are UA's big dog. I hate Notre Dame, but we need to thank them for signing with UA.
This post was edited on 8/18/15 at 8:50 am
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:51 am to LanierSpots
quote:
Nike Under Armour RussellPuma Reebok ChampionFlip FlopsSams Club Adidas
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:54 am to allin2010
Yeah I'm betting Adidas is just a negotiating move. I could see Adidas "offering" a sweet deal, and even if UA hates us a little we have been the most consistent team to represent them on a big stage. I would be shocked if we didn't stay with UA.
Posted on 8/18/15 at 8:59 am to HDAU
Posted on 8/18/15 at 9:08 am to allin2010
I'm a Nike guy. I don't really love UA. Glad they finally improved those tiny names on the jerseys; it was an embarrassment imo. But i would rather stay with UA than go with Adidas.
Posted on 8/18/15 at 9:11 am to GenesChin
quote:
Under Armour is likely trying to flex some muscle in negotiations since they don't "need" us like previously
This isn't true. I expect us to stay with under armor
Posted on 8/18/15 at 9:31 am to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
I'm a Nike guy. I don't really love UA. Glad they finally improved those tiny names on the jerseys; it was an embarrassment imo. But i would rather stay with UA than go with Adidas.
Pretty much this
Page 1 of 4
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News