Started By
Message
AU is not claiming any more national titles
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:06 pm
LINK
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 6:19 pm
7
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:22 pm to ellitor
frick Jay Jacobs
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:26 pm to ellitor
I have no problem with this.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:30 pm to ellitor
Good
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:37 pm to ellitor
Did Marcello really run out of things to write about this week?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:37 pm to ellitor
ok by me
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:52 pm to ellitor
Only people OK with this are the ones concerned about what others will think and say.
1913 National Champs
1914 National Champs
1983 National Champs
These three should be claimed without question. The rest i am ok with not claiming
1913 National Champs
1914 National Champs
1983 National Champs
These three should be claimed without question. The rest i am ok with not claiming
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:59 pm to ChexMix
I am o.k. with it. Keep on recognizing those seasons, along with '93 and 2004, but don't claim them.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:06 pm to Rig
quote:IDK. I know people passionate on both sides of the issue. That's why I posted the article. personally don't care 1 way or the other.
Did Marcello really run out of things to write about this week?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 7:18 pm to MrAUTigers
Good. Still gotta fire Jay Jacobs though
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 8:48 pm to ChexMix
83 for sure because I was alive to see it. The others, meh.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 9:51 pm to Pavoloco83
Meh...NC really don't matter. It's always been subjective and voted on. SEC titles have more prestige.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 10:01 pm to Gimme back that fish
quote:
Meh...NC really don't matter. It's always been subjective and voted on. SEC titles have more prestige.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 10:01 pm to Gimme back that fish
I'm pretty indifferent. Only thing I don't like is people giving a shite what others think about what we do or don't do.
Oh, except for 1983. I'll fight about that. Claim that fricker all day every day.
Oh, except for 1983. I'll fight about that. Claim that fricker all day every day.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 10:24 pm to ellitor
I kind of wish they would just because of all the jimmies it would rustle.
In reality, IDC. I don't need some arbitrary objective poll or ranking to tell me how good Auburn's football history is.
An undefeated season is more impressive to me than being voted #1. That means we got the job done, and did everything that was asked. That's all you can do, and if random people around the country objectively think another team is better then who cares?
In reality, IDC. I don't need some arbitrary objective poll or ranking to tell me how good Auburn's football history is.
An undefeated season is more impressive to me than being voted #1. That means we got the job done, and did everything that was asked. That's all you can do, and if random people around the country objectively think another team is better then who cares?
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 11:56 pm to BowlJackson
I personally would have claimed more, the problem was where to draw the line. To claim only 5 (13, 83, 93) would mean leaving out 2004, etc. I would have added 1913.
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 5/28/15 at 6:14 am to ChexMix
quote:
frick Jay Jacobs
Well said
Page 1 of 1
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News