Started By
Message
re: Watching the game again
Posted on 9/26/16 at 1:44 pm to piggilicious
Posted on 9/26/16 at 1:44 pm to piggilicious
They didn't win because of halftime adjustments. They won because they have more talent and depth.
2
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:02 pm to Porcine Human
i think it was all of those things- anyway don't you have an nfl team to find?
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:14 pm to piggilicious
You got me. Who do I turn in my forum posting privileges to?
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:14 pm to piggilicious
We left 14 points on the field in the FIRST HALF.
Reed's fumble on the 50 - led to 7 A&M points(probably would have got 3/7 points on that drive)
Rawleigh's fumble on the 1 - led to 3 A&M points(Left 7 there)
Inability to score a TD(FG instead) - left 4 extra points on the field.
So uncharacteristic of this team to have those mistakes.
Reed's fumble on the 50 - led to 7 A&M points(probably would have got 3/7 points on that drive)
Rawleigh's fumble on the 1 - led to 3 A&M points(Left 7 there)
Inability to score a TD(FG instead) - left 4 extra points on the field.
So uncharacteristic of this team to have those mistakes.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:17 pm to razorbackfan4life
A&M had 14 damn points on two long QB draws. That CANNOT happen.
We could have won, but I still think A&M is the better team.
The score doesn't reflect how the game should have played out.
Frick our OL though.
We could have won, but I still think A&M is the better team.
The score doesn't reflect how the game should have played out.
Frick our OL though.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:18 pm to razorbackfan4life
quote:
We left 14 points on the field in the FIRST HALF.
i'm aware- in fact, i thought it was more than just 2 td's.
they just seemed like a different team in the 2nd half- rolling over us while we bent over and took it.
porcine- i'm just messing with ya, y'alls overreactions crack me up at times. (eta: excluding porker face who's nothing but a bitch)
This post was edited on 9/26/16 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 9/26/16 at 2:33 pm to piggilicious
I think if we would have tried to throw on the goal line rather than pound it, over and over, we would have had a chance to win. Instead we gave them momentum.
That crap was ridiculous. 3 goal line opportunities and 3 points is totally inexcusable.
That crap was ridiculous. 3 goal line opportunities and 3 points is totally inexcusable.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 4:22 pm to lefty08
quote:
I've seen this said quite a few times. I know Ellis is a punching bag for Hog fans, but it wasn't a mistake by him. That was his assignment. The mistake was in the scheme. If you want to blame a player, blame the safety who took a horrible angle
I'm not blaming Ellis for the loss, if in fact that's where he was supposed to be then it's on CRS.
That play didn't cost us the game, just venting frustration. As I posted before, I think we lost the game in the 2nd qtr.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 4:41 pm to ArHog
You're correct. The 2nd Qtr very well should have ended with no less than a 14pt lead. Going into half tied really screwed us as they got the ball to start.
Personally I ALWAYS prefer to get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Personally I ALWAYS prefer to get the ball to start the 2nd half.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 4:46 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
quote:
Personally I ALWAYS prefer to get the ball to start the 2nd half.
I do as well, especially when considering the offense we run. For what ever reason Bert seems to like getting the ball first but it might just be a being on the road deal. I believed he did it in the TCU game as well.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 4:53 pm to rockiee
He tries to get a lead and keep it.
and fart it away in the 2nd half is what usually happens.
and fart it away in the 2nd half is what usually happens.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 5:17 pm to razorbackfan4life
quote:
A&M had 14 damn points on two long QB draws. That CANNOT happen.
We could have won, but I still think A&M is the better team.
The score doesn't reflect how the game should have played out.
Frick our OL though.
Our inability to take adantage of opportunities in the 2nd quarter hurt us badly. It should've been 21-7 or 24-7 at halftime, which would've made the second half a completely different ballgame.
The game was much more about our inability to put the game out of reach in the first half than their strong showing in the second half.
This post was edited on 9/26/16 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 9/26/16 at 5:45 pm to Porcine Human
quote:They won because we repeatedly shot ourselves in the foot and didn't capitalize in short yardage situations. We had the horses to run with them.
They won because they have more talent and depth.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 6:07 pm to Drewbie
quote:
They won because we repeatedly shot ourselves in the foot and didn't capitalize in short yardage situations. We had the horses to run with them.
This.
Any talent disparity had little or nothing to do with it.
Posted on 9/26/16 at 10:13 pm to Feral
Our lack of talent on the OL certainly didn't make it any easier. OL and safety are pretty big weaknesses compared to what A&M is working with, IMO.
Page 2 of 2
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News