Started By
Message

Should we go more uptempo?

Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:01 pm
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25159 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:01 pm
I am no major disciple of the uptempo all the time offense. I've said it before and I'll say it again that it has its drawbacks and some of them are pretty major.

That having been said...

As this article points out LINK when we go uptempo we have success.

For years we've been the drizzling poo in goal line situations. This year we added some hurry up in close and suddenly became one of the most efficient goal line offenses in the country for a couple of games.

As a change of pace that we throw out every now and then it shows signs of promise. When we went hurry up against Bama we threw the ball well and ran the ball well.

Now this article is by the same guy as the first one was... but it shows that both Enos and Kelley are very comfortable with a hurry up offense. LINK

We can still run our usual offense but if we get a first down say, maybe go hurry up for a play and see if we can catch the other team flat footed. We don't always have to wait until the final 4 seconds to snap the ball.

At this point... what the hell do we have to lose? Even Bama has played uptempo when they think its a good time for it recently.
Posted by Maytheporkbewithyou
Member since Aug 2016
12566 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:15 pm to
Oh, the irony if CBB allowed a hurry up offense. I can't see him allowing it, but we do move the ball with a purpose when we're speeding it up.

With our OL problems, I've often wondered why our QB us always under center. QB would actually have a better chance if we were in the shotgun more. Just my opinion.
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 6:49 pm
Posted by HogX
Madison, WI
Member since Dec 2012
5039 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:21 pm to
Yes, we should. But we won't. Bret already backed himself into that corner with the player's safety stuff.
Posted by Razorback Reverend
Member since Dec 2013
22699 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Yes, we should. But we won't. Bret already backed himself into that corner with the player's safety stuff.


we will, if Bret wants a chance at salvaging a career... at a decent power 5 school.
Posted by HogX
Madison, WI
Member since Dec 2012
5039 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:35 pm to
LINK

We'll see. Dude will take a lambasting after all the shite he talked back in 2014 about up-tempo offenses and their affects on players.

quote:

Bret Bielema says he has evidence proving his belief that hurry-up offenses pose a safety risk to college football players.

"Death certificates," Bielema said Thursday night. "There's no more anything I need than that."
Posted by ArHog
Muss is a coward
Member since Jan 2008
32892 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 4:43 pm to
FAYETTEVILLE — Auburn coach Gus Malzahn may have done a double take when he watched the Arkansas-Alabama game tape on Sunday.
There was Arkansas, in an up-tempo offense against Alabama. It was only a few years ago that Arkansas coach Bret Bielema argued against that style of play, citing risks for the players.
But, down 24-0 at halftime, Bielema told Dan Enos, his offensive coordinator, to stick with the two-minute scheme they used to finish the first half.
The idea was to prevent Alabama to substitute defensive personnel based on down and distance. And, the Hogs caught the Tide in one substitution issue with a lineman near the sideline as the play was snapped.
Bielema had given game officials the heads up before the game that the Arkansas offensive plans included at least some up-tempo possessions, during which the Hogs would not substitute so that the Tide would not be allowed to change personnel, either.
“They held up the play once for Alabama to change personnel,” Bielema said, noting he then talked to game officials again to remind them not to hold the snap for defensive changes.
Neither Bielema or Enos would reveal whether or not that would be the plan against Auburn this week, but it could include up-tempo.
“We've had it in,” Enos said. “We work on it. That's (Bielema's) call when we use it.”
Bielema said with the way the first half ended – with an offensive drive – made him go to it more in the second half.
The up-tempo -- both with the quarterback in shotgun and under center -- helped make reads simpler for redshirt freshman Cole Kelley so that Alabama would stay in the same personnel. Kelley completed 23 of 42 passes for 200 yards in his first start. It sounds like he might get a second. Austin Allen, out with a shoulder injury, is doubtful for the Auburn game.


Bert's decision.



I feared he was meddling in the play calling.
Posted by Pigfeet
Ark Mods are Fascists
Member since Mar 2010
19783 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 5:20 pm to
Yes

Edit: With a different coach, not Arnold
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 5:24 pm
Posted by Malvy
Member since Nov 2015
133 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 5:24 pm to
Keep teams off balance. Unless we rock, we cannot be predictable.
Posted by russellvillehog
Member since Apr 2016
9711 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 5:27 pm to
He is scared he is about to lose his job, and he is caving under the pressure to try something against his philosophy to save himself.

He knows that it wears your defense out. He also knows it has advantages. Hell what he needs to do is run the Peyton manning version of the no huddle. Hurry up to the line. Prevent subs and then milk the clock while in formation. You get the best of both worlds, or if you see them trying to sub snap it and get a free play.

I believe we will see more of it as the season goes along. We will use both systems (as we should)

You can catch teams off guard by doing both as it will not be a constant. What we need to do is use it on different drives throughout the game. When we get a favorable match up, go no huddle and hold that advantage. Then when you feel your players need a rest, go back to the huddle.

Hell I'm not against going back and forth on the same drive. It is how I used to play Madden. When I felt like I had the defense on thier heels I would stop milking the clock and go no huddle after a positive play. If you get a big play, and you feel a momentum swing, go ahead and just go hurry up to keep the defense on thier heels and do not let them clear thier head for the next play.
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 5:33 pm
Posted by ArHog
Muss is a coward
Member since Jan 2008
32892 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

He is scared he is about to lose his job, and he is caving under the pressure to try something against his philosophy to save himself.

He knows that it wears your defense out. He also knows it has advantages. Hell what he needs to do is run the Peyton manning version of the no huddle. Hurry up to the line. Prevent subs and then milk the clock while in formation. You get the best of both worlds, or if you see them trying to sub snap it and get a free play.


Hell, I agree. Bert needs to pull all the stops out to win some SEC games.

Every league game he loses is costing him another legit coaching job.

It's mind blowing how we've gotten so bad, so fast.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36744 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 1:03 pm to
yes we should. I'm not for full time uptempo but something better than a snails crawl especially after big plays and when the defense is in a bad matchup.
Posted by Person of interest
The Hill
Member since Jan 2014
1786 posts
Posted on 10/18/17 at 9:41 pm to
I have no problem with the philosophy of our offense, but if you are going to run a pro style offense the two things that are needed are run game/good o line and defense. Beet has not produced either. I also have no problem with a hurry up or spread, no matter which way you go tho you better be able to recruit to the system played. Nolan knew this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter