Started By
Message
Predict the assistants we lose during the offseason
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:00 pm
gonna say Segrest will be asked to move on, Rhoads will be promoted or move on, and Robb Smith will find a DC position elsewhere
7
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:11 pm to hawgfaninc
Enos will find greener pastures.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:36 pm to Inadvertent Whistle
quote:
Enos will find greener pastures.
If this happens, Bert can go ahead and pack his bags bc we will be worse than this year.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:41 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Segrest will be asked to move on
quote:
Robb Smith will find a DC position elsewhere
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:48 pm to hawgfaninc
As long as we do whatever it takes to keep Enos, Smith and Lunney, I don't care where anyone else goes b
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:55 pm to hawgfaninc
Robb and Segrest are probably gone. Bielema has made staff changes every single year. Our defense as a whole and especially our run defense and pass rush were the worst parts.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 5:58 pm to hawgfaninc
Probably just Smith, I could see Rhoads going next year but I think he stays one more year at DBs unless we promote him.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:10 pm to hawgfaninc
Robb Smith is staying, the talk of changing to a 3-4 is to keep him around.
I'm gonna be pissed if Charlie Partridge doesn't replace Segrest.
I'm gonna be pissed if Charlie Partridge doesn't replace Segrest.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:46 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
Robb Smith is staying, the talk of changing to a 3-4 is to keep him around.
No way he is staying if they perform poorly at the bowl. I could believe it if they play well though.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:50 pm to rockiee
quote:
No way he is staying if they perform poorly at the bowl. I could believe it if they play well though.
In that case I hope we win 60-59 with all of their TDs being 80 yard runs. That'll probably happen anyway though.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:54 pm to rockiee
quote:
No way he is staying if they perform poorly at the bowl. I could believe it if they play well though.
The bowl shouldn't factor in at all. If we shut them out he should be fired. Hell, he shouldn't even be coaching the bowl.
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:19 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
Robb Smith is staying, the talk of changing to a 3-4 is to keep him around.
I'm gonna be pissed if Charlie Partridge doesn't replace Segrest.
wouldn't surprise me at all if smith stays and partridge is brought in
eta if our dline improves our entire defense improves drastically
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:21 pm to Arkansasrazorback
quote:
If we shut them out he should be fired. Hell, he shouldn't even be coaching the bowl.
I wouldn't disagree but I could only see him staying in a situation like that
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:35 pm to rockiee
I think this hint of a 3-4 defense is a excuse to keep Robb around another year.
Likely CRS isn't going anywhere, Segrest may fall on the sword.
Likely CRS isn't going anywhere, Segrest may fall on the sword.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:55 pm to ArHog
quote:
I think this hint of a 3-4 defense is a excuse to keep Robb around another year.
Probably right, but if it doesn't work, it gives him ample firepower to send him packing for someone else.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:57 pm to ArHog
I cringed today hearing him say that he was looking forward to putting in some 3-4 looks during the spring.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:59 pm to TheCheshireHog
Especially since we're short on legit LB's
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:03 pm to ArHog
i mean, if we're going to do it let's do it. i don'tw ant "3-4 looks" i want a fricking 3-4. if we are going to suck, let's at least have the novelty of running a defense we've all creamed our pants wanting to run for the last 15 years lol.
smith's track record wise, i can picture a scenario where he doesn't completely suck dick and a change of schemes benefits him.
but the D line coach needs to go
smith's track record wise, i can picture a scenario where he doesn't completely suck dick and a change of schemes benefits him.
but the D line coach needs to go
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:15 pm to hawgfaninc
I'm going to go ahead and sum up this thread by saying that the consensus is Robb Smith and Segrest, both of whom I agree need to be gone yesterday.
However, here are my two additions:
1. Anderson - our offensive line was a horror show, and his matador blocking scheme almost got Austin killed. This hire just looks like one on which Bert simply outsmarted himself.
2. Herbert - his S&C program absolutely sucks, and it's not translating at all to the SEC. This is the second straight year of our team absolutely getting pushed around and physically manhandled on both sides of the line. We're also profoundly slow. Basically, we're everything you don't want in an SEC football team - big, weak and slow. Also, his stupid one legged squats cost us Jonathan Williams last year (dear God how awesome would it have been to have him and Collins in the backfield last year).
However, here are my two additions:
1. Anderson - our offensive line was a horror show, and his matador blocking scheme almost got Austin killed. This hire just looks like one on which Bert simply outsmarted himself.
2. Herbert - his S&C program absolutely sucks, and it's not translating at all to the SEC. This is the second straight year of our team absolutely getting pushed around and physically manhandled on both sides of the line. We're also profoundly slow. Basically, we're everything you don't want in an SEC football team - big, weak and slow. Also, his stupid one legged squats cost us Jonathan Williams last year (dear God how awesome would it have been to have him and Collins in the backfield last year).
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:16 pm to The_Joker
i woudln't be against anderson coming back. the line got better and he got left with dogshit to work with.
Page 1 of 2
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News