Started By
Message
re: Rolando continues to be a complete dumb f u c k
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:31 am to Caplewood
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:31 am to Caplewood
Ro's issues all fall with the crowd that he has continued to hang with back home. When he signed with the Raiders, he should have cut all ties to the city of Decatur. Continue to run with questionable people leads to his problems. Outside of his house in T'town "mysteriously" burning to the ground, all of his issues have happened with each visit back home.
Personally, I think he suffers from being bipolar or schizophrenia. Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
Personally, I think he suffers from being bipolar or schizophrenia. Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 8:56 am to UAgrad93
quote:
Personally, I think he suffers from being bipolar or schizophrenia. Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
I think you are right
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:45 am to Cobrasize
quote:
Holy shite it's expensive
I'd just use it for pain, if it was legal here. I don't like taking pain pills.
They have weed for just that alone. It's high in cannabinoids which reduce inflammation and help with pain but has little to no THC. It's usually a little cheaper because it doesn't get you high.
They also have stuff that you can apply as a cream to parts of your body. I've never tried it, don't know if it works. wax, oils, concentrates, etc. I never fool with any of it.
I won't take pain pills. The last time I got them was about 12 years ago after a hernia surgery. I took them for about a day because I had too, and as soon as I could bear the pain I stopped taking them and threw the rest away.
They had a vote out here last year to make weed legal completely. The pharmaceutical companies publicly spent millions of dollars in ads and false commercials to beat it.
They don't want people to have the alternative.
Rolando has or had the codeine addiction as well. Weed would be a much better alternative for him.
There are lots of elderly people who have prescriptions here. 80 years old and you see them at the dispensaries.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:51 am to 3down10
quote:
They had a vote out here last year to make weed legal completely
Where you live baw?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:22 am to 14&Counting
Arizona
I have a card, so I'm legal already. But it would be nice not to pay $300 a year just to be legal.
I have a card, so I'm legal already. But it would be nice not to pay $300 a year just to be legal.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:48 am to 3down10
quote:
Arizona
That is what I was thinking
quote:
I have a card, so I'm legal already.
So it's just medical now and no recreational? ...and you have to be an AZ citizen with drivers license? That is the way it used to be in Colorado.....had to have a "red card" and had to be a citizen to get one.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 11:38 am to 14&Counting
Yeah, AZ citizen and only medical.
I got my card the same week I got my AZ DL(only reason I switched my ID over when I did was to get it).
It's worth the $300 just for the peace of mind.
I got my card the same week I got my AZ DL(only reason I switched my ID over when I did was to get it).
It's worth the $300 just for the peace of mind.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 1:30 pm to 3down10
quote:
I am a Sativa guy, all I buy is Sativa strains, sometimes I'll grab some 70/30 hybrid with a little indica.
I didn't see an offering more sativa than the 70/30 numbers. A damn shame considering the climate and quantity of natural light y'all receive. But since you are in Arizona, a fellow ranter may grow your weed.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 2:00 pm to MoarKilometers
Yeah, they always have way more hybrids than anything.
But they still have Emerald Jack. I got a 1/4 of it last week along with Summer Breeze which they don't have listed now(comes out to about $98 after taxes). Both were good, Summer Breeze seemed to last a bit longer as the Emerald Jack was very dense.
Well, they have Summer Breeze shake. I've never gotten their shake, but I sometimes get shake from other places when they sell it because it is cheaper.
I usually go on Tuesdays when they have $45 quarters for all strains. But if they don't have a better selection of Sativa's tomorrow, I'll probably go somewhere else. Sometimes they have Sativa's, but they are only 12-17% THC. I go somewhere else then because it's the deal on the top shelf strains I go for.
I just started going to that one about a month ago specifically for the Tuesday deal.
All that said, I wish I knew more people here and could find a good source for just some regular old weed you can get for $80-$100 an oz like when I was younger. But everyone claims their stuff is "medium grade" minimum and wants to be stupid with prices, so it's off to the dispensary I go.
I probably do buy his weed.
Edit: The company that grew the stuff I bought last week was "Zonacare Inc". His link in the OP doesn't work, did you catch the name of it?
But they still have Emerald Jack. I got a 1/4 of it last week along with Summer Breeze which they don't have listed now(comes out to about $98 after taxes). Both were good, Summer Breeze seemed to last a bit longer as the Emerald Jack was very dense.
Well, they have Summer Breeze shake. I've never gotten their shake, but I sometimes get shake from other places when they sell it because it is cheaper.
I usually go on Tuesdays when they have $45 quarters for all strains. But if they don't have a better selection of Sativa's tomorrow, I'll probably go somewhere else. Sometimes they have Sativa's, but they are only 12-17% THC. I go somewhere else then because it's the deal on the top shelf strains I go for.
I just started going to that one about a month ago specifically for the Tuesday deal.
All that said, I wish I knew more people here and could find a good source for just some regular old weed you can get for $80-$100 an oz like when I was younger. But everyone claims their stuff is "medium grade" minimum and wants to be stupid with prices, so it's off to the dispensary I go.
I probably do buy his weed.
Edit: The company that grew the stuff I bought last week was "Zonacare Inc". His link in the OP doesn't work, did you catch the name of it?
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 2:04 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
You pose a risk to other people when you don't wear your seatbelt while driving.
So why do motorcyclists get away with it?
I know you posted gifs of people injuring fellow passengers inside the vehicle, but I've seen the argument made that wearing your seatbelt keeps you from being ejected from the car therefore protecting other people on the road.
If a motorcyclist gets into an accident are they not just as likely to fly into another person on the road?
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 2:32 pm to TideSaint
quote:
If a motorcyclist gets into an accident are they not just as likely to fly into another person on the road?
Beats me. If you can design a motorcycle seatbelt that would save lives, you could probably get rich off it.
I'm not a rider so I don't know what is best for them.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 6:26 am to TideSaint
quote:
If a motorcyclist gets into an accident are they not just as likely to fly into another person on the road?
No. I'd think the likelihood of them actually hitting another person is extremely small.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 8:31 am to pvilleguru
quote:
No. I'd think the likelihood of them actually hitting another person is extremely small.
Now you are just being obtuse. You know when I say another person that could be another vehicle and not an individual walking down the street.
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 8:37 am
Posted on 5/16/17 at 8:34 am to TideSaint
quote:
Now you are just being obtuse. You know when I say another person that could be another vehicle and not an individual walking down the street.
If a person hits a vehicle, that person isn't going to do much harm to the vehicle. Maybe put a dent in a door or break a window. You will do a lot more damage to a person if you were in the car with them.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 8:37 am to pvilleguru
quote:
You will do a lot more damage to a person if you were in the car with them.
That's not the only reason why they have seatbelt laws. They have them so people don't get ejected into on-coming traffic.
ETA: Gifs added above of motorcyclists being thrown after a wreck to illustrate the point.
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 8:39 am
Posted on 5/16/17 at 9:29 am to TideSaint
There is no such thing as a seatbelt for motorcycles and the risks you are talking are minor compared to being the driver of a car.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 9:36 am to 3down10
quote:
There is no such thing as a seatbelt for motorcycles
Exactly. Why should there be a seatbelt law for someone in a car, especially if they are driving by themselves?
I can't hurt any passengers INSIDE my vehicle if there aren't any.
quote:
risks you are talking are minor compared to being the driver of a car.
How so? If I'm driving my car and get into an accident I at least have a window to go through before I'm ejected and become a 180 pound missile.
On a bike there are no barriers to stop me from flying across the road.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 9:43 am to TideSaint
I'm more worried about the car without a driver than I am the driver...
Posted on 5/16/17 at 9:48 am to 3down10
quote:
I'm more worried about the car without a driver than I am the driver...
And you're not worried about a motorcycle flying out of control going down the highway?
Posted on 5/17/17 at 8:41 am to TideSaint
quote:
And you're not worried about a motorcycle flying out of control going down the highway?
No. Without a rider, they tend to fall over. It's a possibility, but it's extremely unlikely. And unlike car seatbelt laws, there aren't a bunch of other benefits backing it up.
Latest Alabama News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News