Started By
Message

Our defense will return to an elite level

Posted on 1/4/15 at 8:28 pm
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 8:28 pm
I firmly believe that our defense truly suffered because of 2 main areas, cbs and mlb. The 2011 defense featured 2 first round cbs, an All Pro Mlb, another MlB that should have made the Pro bowl and a first round safety. Add in an elite pass rusher and you have an elite defense. The past 2 years the defense didn't feature all of that, but some of it. With the the past class and this current one we should be approaching that same level again. My only concern is the MLB position. We will definitely need a mlb that can cover as well as fill the gaps. Whom on the roster, or in this current class, can do both?
Posted by Bamaman54
Florence, Alabama
Member since Dec 2013
487 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 8:29 pm to
I'd like to see what Reuben Foster and Rashaan Evans have to offer. BTW, is Dee Liner ever going to play?
Posted by Recruitingjunkie
Member since Jan 2014
3059 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

I'd like to see what Reuben Foster and Rashaan Evans have to offer. BTW, is Dee Liner ever going to play?


Evans and foster should start next year. Dee liner will probably take a little more of a role than he had this past year. He's kind of like pagan imo. We are just too stacked right now for him to be in the 2 deep... Pettway is a backup for gods sake. Robinson Reed Allen again. Pettway Tomlinson Hand 2's. Liner Payne Frazier 3's.
This post was edited on 1/4/15 at 8:40 pm
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 8:36 pm to
I think both can play the gap but only Evans would have the ability to cover like we would need. Liner should find his way into the rotation, hopefully. With our recent recruiting I think we should put one of our bulkier safeties in the middle on dime packages
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18302 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 8:37 pm to
Not seeing it....
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 1/4/15 at 8:42 pm to
I have no doubt about it. We return a crazy amount of experience in the front 7, and all of our Corners.

We definitely want Ragland to stay though. We don't "need" him to, but he would give the D a huge boost.

I'm starting to wonder if Reuben will live up to the hype. I don't like him against spread teams unless he's blitzing, and I don't know if he's even a sideline-sideline guy against the run. I think he's strictly a between the tackles run defender and a blitzer, but I need to see more before I know that to be true.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:07 am to
Talent isn't the issue, except for maybe the corners. Whole team needs play with a sense of urgency and killer instinct.

The problem is more mental than physical. We couldn't stop anyone on 3rd down all year, especially in passing situations.
Posted by OldPete
Georgia
Member since Oct 2013
2804 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Our defense will return to an elite level

Maybe, maybe not...spread offenses have a pretty good grasp of our D now and the better ones are starting to consistently beat us on the perimeter. We're gonna have to adapt and do something different to throw 'em off. While I think we have the talent to do so on the DL, not so sure 'bout our LBs and DBs for next year. The DL is very deep but we're thin at LB even if Ragland comes back. Safeties we'll be very thin (experience wise) as we lose Collins, Perry, and Williams. We'll have our best CB back in Jones (who's also the smallest) but, while the others have potential, they're unproven as yet...

I think the key will be whether we have the talent/ability/depth to be able to run multiple defenses and be unconventional at times. We're gonna have to be multiple enough to be able to be unconventional against the good spread teams but still be conventional against teams that can pound it like LSU.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20756 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 10:22 am to
I think we all need to accept that for the forseeable future, we won't be containing offenses like we could a few years ago. That's just the nature of the beast right now. Offenses are becoming too dynamic.

That said, our secondary has not been up to our standards since 2012. I'm not a roster guru or numbers guy, but IMO none of our current DBs would start over anyone we had from 2008-2011/12. It just seems like we've had a huge dropoff in talent at that position.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52633 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:00 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 11:07 am
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52633 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I think we all need to accept that for the forseeable future, we won't be containing offenses like we could a few years ago. That's just the nature of the beast right now. Offenses are becoming too dynamic.



I see what you are saying, and while I agree that it has something to do with it, letting a QB connect for 30+ yards with a WR downfield on third down is just bad defense. Really has little to do with the opposing offense. It was mindblowing how many times that happened this year.

quote:

It just seems like we've had a huge dropoff in talent at that position.


Yeah, early departures don't help. I feel like Cyrus is up to par, but Eddie was not this year, and we just did not have anyone that could relieve him. However, I feel like Eddie will bounce back, because he has the tools to be great.

As far as talent at CB position, we have a lot. They are just young. I don't feel like we are hurting there.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 11:02 am
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20756 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I see what you are saying, and while I agree that it has something to do with it, letting a QB connect for 30+ yards with a WR downfield on third down is just bad defense. Really has little to do with the opposing offense. It was mindblowing how many times that happened this year.


Totally Agree. Its completely unacceptable. My point concerned how we are past the days of going through a whole season and only allowing one or two teams score more than 14. As someone said in another thread, 21 is the new 10.
Posted by Cumulonimbus
Alabama
Member since Jun 2014
623 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:17 am to
quote:

That said, our secondary has not been up to our standards since 2012. I'm not a roster guru or numbers guy, but IMO none of our current DBs would start over anyone we had from 2008-2011/12. It just seems like we've had a huge dropoff in talent at that position.
I agree with this and disagree with the title. As the OP mentioned, previous elite defenses were studded and this team had not true studs.

More importantly, the 2009 and 2011 defenses weren't really tested. 2009 Florida was considerably worse than 2008 Florida. Alabama played Texas's backup QB.

2011 Alabama did not play any good, balanced offenses. Arkansas was the only good offense the team played, but they could not run the ball. LSU could not pass the ball. We will never know how 2011 Alabama would have fared with 2011 LSU's schedule. I occasionally mention that stats are dependent upon competition, and that applies to Alabama too.

The past 2 defenses had tougher competition and less talent. It's not so much that offenses are ahead of the game as it that flaws in the program's defense are finally being exposed because Alabama is actually playing against great offenses now.

Oregon and 2012-2013 Stanford didn't have much trouble defending modern and pro-style offenses.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52633 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:31 am to
I think that the premise of your post is fair, and is something that many people choose to ignore.

People like to compare seasons, teams, and championships, and this and that, etc., but at the end of the day, each CFB season and landscape is so much different than the next that you can't really do that.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 11:32 am
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20756 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:33 am to
quote:

2011 Alabama did not play any good, balanced offenses. Arkansas was the only good offense the team played, but they could not run the ball. LSU could not pass the ball. We will never know how 2011 Alabama would have fared with 2011 LSU's schedule. I occasionally mention that stats are dependent upon competition, and that applies to Alabama too.


That's a really good point. The 2011 Alabama Defense is GOAT but they really never faced an offense like the current group has. Now that defense would do a much better job at shutting down these offenses we're struggling with because it had so much talent but it wouldn't be the brick wall it was in 2011. The speed on that D was unmatched and appears to be one of the elements we're missing right now. I think LSU's defense that year had a bunch of ballhawks that could make plays. Our defense was just immovable.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 11:34 am
Posted by The Silverback
Neptune
Member since May 2013
2036 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:36 am to
While our defense has been tested quite a bit recently, we've done OK with lesser talent with almost the same scheme as 2011 and 2012. Id imagine those defenses would adjust and do pretty well. Both of those defenses were good at that.

The way the defense has been in 2013 and '14 I don't think is indicative of how 2011 would have fared (given the better offenses we've faced)
Posted by OldPete
Georgia
Member since Oct 2013
2804 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

More importantly, the 2009 and 2011 defenses weren't really tested.

We played 3 top 20 offenses in '09 (UF #6, AU #16, Arky #20). I agree with you 'bout 2011 (we played NO top 20 offenses), highest was Arky at 29) but our 2009 defense was a different story, at least in the quality of offenses we played...

quote:

2009 Florida was considerably worse than 2008 Florida.

Disagree. UF was 6th in total offense in 2009 while they were 15th in total offense in 2008...they were also 4th in total defense in '09 while they were 9th in '08...don't see any way that can be accurately described as "considerably worse"...
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:34 pm to
2011 would shut down any offense. I don't wanna hear that "they weren't tested" bullshite. Arky was as good as any offense in the country that year, imo, and we shut them down.
Posted by OldPete
Georgia
Member since Oct 2013
2804 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

2011 would shut down any offense. I don't wanna hear that "they weren't tested"

Well, I think 2011 was a great defense but I can't argue much 'bout them being tested...I read somewhere that the next best offense they played after Arky (#29) that year was ranked in the 70's (South Carolina, I think). I think they'd have done well against most offenses that year, but they didn't get the chance as that was just the way the schedule fell...

However, one offense that they didn't shut down was Georgia Southern. Southern was the only team that scored more than 14 points against us and they rushed for more than 300 yards (and over 7 YPC). I recall Dont'a Hightower being asked, after the season, who had the best offense Bama faced that year and he didn't hesitate in answering "Georgia Southern"...
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 3:54 pm
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:55 pm to
Georgia Southern did good because a few starters were out, they have a triple option offense, and the D didn't take them seriously enough to prepare.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter