Started By
Message

Should we expand womens role in the Military?

Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:30 pm
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32647 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:30 pm
Do you think females should be assigned to combat units?

Do you think US will ever have women fighting on the front lines?

Spec Ops?
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16316 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:34 pm to
No

No

No

They've tried it and its failed. Blame biology.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:51 pm to
Women can't fight on the front lines? I seriously didn't know. I figured with equals rights came equal responsibility.
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:01 pm to
We should expand women's roll on ma cock! Amirite? Amirite?
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:38 pm to
No

Yes

No
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90468 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Should we expand womens role in the Military?


Yes.

Someone has to keep the barracks clean and those brave men fed.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37672 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:49 pm to
Here's a novel idea, let whoever can pass the physical tests do what they want.
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32647 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:50 pm to
I support that 100%


Edit: if the physical test are the same for both genders
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 9:55 pm
Posted by derSturm37
Texas
Member since May 2013
1521 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 10:10 pm to
Here's where good ol' Sturm gets all politically incorrect and pissess off a lot of sthensthitive people. (I know: shocker!)

I don't know if it's still this way or not, but when I was in the Army it was like this: The females of the infantry went on bivouac with the males. Wore the same clothes. Carried the same rucks. Trained with the same weapons. Whole nine yards. (For those who don't know bivouac can last several weeks, during which time everyone stays in the field. You eat, sleep, shite in the field. No one leaves until the exercise is over). Except the women. Every 3 days the busses would show up and all the females would get on them. They'd ride back to base, take showers, and return. The rest of us were left to scrub our nuts with pine cones.

Why did the women get to shower every 3 days? I haven't done the research but I was told that if an adult female doesn't wash effectively circa every 3 days then her junk will start to smell so strongly that it will bother not only her but those around her. MOREOVER: If a substantial group of them didn't bathe effectively circa every 5 - 7 days then their collective scent would be detectable at a distance by enemy combatants.

There were experiments in place re the logistics of providing ample field baths for female fighters.

Posted by Robert Goulet
Member since Jan 2013
9999 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 10:21 pm to
With the modern delineated battlefield, women have already served on the front lines.

As has been mentioned, standards should be the same and not lowered to fit an agenda. Some chicks kick arse at the military thing; most however, do not.
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
24744 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 10:22 pm to
No
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37672 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 10:26 pm to
Why do women wear perfume and makeup? Because they're ugly and they stink.
Posted by Merck
Tuscaloosa
Member since Nov 2009
1693 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 10:37 pm to
I have a friend who was in EOD in the national guard. She's got pics from Iraq of her lighting frickers up with a Humvee mounted machine gun and one awesome shot when an IOD she was disarming exploded on her. It looks straight out of a movie or something, the visual is amazing but it totally fricked her leg up. She had to disarm another bomb with her leg bleeding before her buddies could come get here.

Some women definitely couldn't hack it in combat but I know one who had no fricking problem with it.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37672 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 10:40 pm to
I bet she's a bull dyke.

Not saying that as a slight, that's exactly where those women should be.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37573 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Do you think females should be assigned to combat units?

Do you think US will ever have women fighting on the front lines?

Spec Ops?


frick ... that this question is even being asked pisses me off.

I got into it with Jackie Collins and Larry King when she was promoting her book Hollywood Wives 30 years ago over this same shite.

Yes ... women's roles should be expanded to concubine status .... blow jobs and poon. They make decent pilots ....and nurses. After that, frick no. Keep them the frick away from the front line.

Have you ever smelled a menstrating woman in hot weather who has been in the field for a couple of weeks without a shower? Dropping bloody rags along the way like bread crumbs. Forget the smell ... the bitching and special needs is even worse.

frick no. Just frick no.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 11:02 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79942 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 9:14 am to
There are certain jobs that will never be assigned to women.

Example: Military adviser in Saudi Arabia

The fact of the matter is that the life of an Infantryman is really hard on both the body and the mind of the individual.

How many Infantrymen wearing the rank of LTC or above or MSG or above have you seen that don't look significantly older than they actually are.

Now imagine a woman going through that same process.

The simple fact is that women have a shorter shelf life than men when it comes to certain types of occupations. The military is one of them.

The fact that they tend to live longer overall is irrelevant.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 9:35 am to
I served 4 years in Army logistics, in companies and units with a high ratio of women. I had great female and male soldiers. My answers:

quote:

Do you think females should be assigned to combat units?



No.

quote:

Do you think US will ever have women fighting on the front lines?



Yes, and it will degrade our front line fighting ability.

quote:

Spec Ops?



Yes. And it will degrade our fighting ability.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55211 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 9:37 am to
It will happen one day.

I'll consider the more deeply if you share the name of your Avi
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 9:38 am to
quote:

I don't know if it's still this way or not, but when I was in the Army it was like this: The females of the infantry went on bivouac with the males. Wore the same clothes. Carried the same rucks. Trained with the same weapons. Whole nine yards. (For those who don't know bivouac can last several weeks, during which time everyone stays in the field. You eat, sleep, shite in the field. No one leaves until the exercise is over). Except the women. Every 3 days the busses would show up and all the females would get on them. They'd ride back to base, take showers, and return. The rest of us were left to scrub our nuts with pine cones.


I've heard this as a barracks tale, but in the 30 days we were at NTC in the bush, this never happened.
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32647 posts
Posted on 3/4/15 at 10:35 am to
Sara Jean Underwood.
This post was edited on 3/4/15 at 10:37 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter