Started By
Message
What's wrong with moving AU to East and UT to West?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:39 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:39 am
Keep the cross division rivalries.
New Cross Division rivalries:
Auburn-Bama
UT-UF
LSU-UGA
Auburn gets to play all our rivals. TSIO is maintained. LSU gets rid of their "disadvantage". Seems like everybody would be happy in this scenario.
For those who can't read:
This keeps the Iron Bowl intact.
New Cross Division rivalries:
Auburn-Bama
UT-UF
LSU-UGA
Auburn gets to play all our rivals. TSIO is maintained. LSU gets rid of their "disadvantage". Seems like everybody would be happy in this scenario.
For those who can't read:
This keeps the Iron Bowl intact.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 11:01 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:40 am to Weagle25
quote:
What's wrong with moving AU to East
What is it about Alabama schools and their obsession with easier schedules? How about we just keep the West as powerful as it is? I like the competition for the West title each year.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 10:42 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:41 am to Weagle25
Alabama felt it would give us an advantage in recruiting... USC, UK, Vandy preferred playing UT...
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:41 am to Weagle25
quote:
LSU gets rid of their "disadvantage".
Baton Rouge isn't going anywhere
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:41 am to Weagle25
I may be mistaken, but UT has a little bit of a thing with UK, VU, and UF. Not sure UT would agree to this
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:42 am to Weagle25
quote:
What's wrong with moving AU to East and UT to West?
quote:
LSU-UGA
Well that would not be fair.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:42 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
What is it about Alabama schools and their obsession with easier schedules
ha...well played. I love irony.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:42 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
What is it about Alabama schools and their obsession with easier schedules?
I thought having UF was an automatic hard schedule
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:42 am to Weagle25
Move Auburn to the East.
Move Mizzou to the West.
Move Bama to the East.
Move Vandy to the west.
The need for a permanent cross division opponent is eliminated.
Move Mizzou to the West.
Move Bama to the East.
Move Vandy to the west.
The need for a permanent cross division opponent is eliminated.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:43 am to Weagle25
Nah, if AU were to switch with an East team it should be Missouri.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:43 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
I may be mistaken, but UT has a little bit of a thing with UK, VU, and UF. Not sure UT would agree to this
Well they keep the UF rivalry. The other two teams suck so who cares.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:44 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
I thought having UF was an automatic hard schedule
Believe me, I'm the rare LSU fan who loves playing Florida every single year. I've never complained about playing Florida.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:44 am to Weagle25
Not that Ags have any room to talk, but why are Auburn fans so willing to give up a 100+ year old rivalry?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:44 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
I may be mistaken, but UT has a little bit of a thing with UK, VU, and UF. Not sure UT would agree to this
Maybe...I care far more about preserving rivalries with Alabama and Florida/UGA than I do about Vanderbilt and Kentucky.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:44 am to CoffeeAg
quote:
but why are Auburn fans so willing to give up a 100+ year old rivalry?
Which one?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:45 am to Weagle25
Our disadvantage is easy to see. Scheduling office is located in Alabama. Alabama is full of fanatical, mostly crazy, gumps/barners who will kill historical landmarks (and each other), drag sweaty ball sacks against poor unsuspecting rival fans, and even jump 3 rows on top of frat boys for disrespecting a retarded son. LSU is not located in Alabama. Disadvantage LSU.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:45 am to Weagle25
quote:
UT-UF
LSU-UGA
Why would that be the pairings? It would be UGA/UT and UF/LSU.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News