Started By
Message
Manziel recommendation from NCAA on Wednesday
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:14 am
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:14 am
@finebaum: RT@LopezOnSports: The NCAA will announce its recommendation on Manziel play or no-play on Wednesday, according to an A&M source.”
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 10:10 am
36
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:16 am to ChemE in the OP
and then TAMU announces it's decision of whether to tell the NCAA to go frick themselves or not. 
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:16 am to ChemE in the OP
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:17 am to JStanDawgFan
POPKERN
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:18 am to ChemE in the OP
Three bags.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:18 am to ChemE in the OP
If I'm A&M, I play him no matter what they say. Vacation doesn't take away the publicity or the money, and A&M isn't winning shite without him, so what's the downside?
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:19 am to ChemE in the OP
Really hope he plays. If he did sell autographs he should sit because others who have been busted for doing similar things have had to sit. But I hope he plays. I want to see him play and I want to see how defenses adjust.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:19 am to ChemE in the OP
as long as manziel lies there's nothing the ncaa can do to him.
good luck to them finding a paper trail.
good luck to them finding a paper trail.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:19 am to ChemE in the OP
Who is Lopez on sports?
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:20 am to ChemE in the OP
They are going to suggest him to sit
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:20 am to ChemE in the OP
Good god the NCAA is such a joke of an institution.
ETA: I hope A&M plays him no matter what just to tell the NCAA to frick themselves.
ETA: I hope A&M plays him no matter what just to tell the NCAA to frick themselves.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 8:21 am
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:20 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
what's the downside?
Playing a game you cannot win.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:22 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
If I'm A&M, I play him no matter what they say. Vacation doesn't take away the publicity or the money, and A&M isn't winning shite without him, so what's the downside?
The downside if you play him when the NCAA told you what was up beforehand? I would think if you tell the NCAA frick you, then they might decide to do a lot more than just vacate wins. They could slap you with lack of institutional control (i.e., we let our players break the rules, find out about it, and play them anyway with no consequences) which could mean scholarship losses, bowl/playoff bans, etc. There is a definite possible downside.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 8:23 am
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:22 am to Tilco Baller
quote:
Who is Lopez on sports?
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:22 am to ChemE in the OP
I'm so ready to quit hearing about this stuff.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:22 am to ChemE in the OP
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:22 am to ChemE in the OP
In
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:23 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
If I'm A&M, I play him no matter what they say. Vacation doesn't take away the publicity or the money, and A&M isn't winning shite without him, so what's the downside?
It's either lose 5 games without him or make money on a vacated season. They gon' take da money...
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:24 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
so what's the downside?
Forefiture of those games, scolly reductions, and a host of other penalties,
Bama played that same game and didn't work out so well
Page 1 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News