Started By
Message
re: A look at 2 great, recent drafts from the state of Alabama...
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:04 pm to Fearthehat0307
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:04 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
auburn got shut out 23-0 irrelevant comparison is irrelevant
The 03 club did. Do you think the 2012 LSU club will be the same as 2011. Or better yet, is there any comparison whasoever between 2010 LSU and 2011 LSU?
1
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:05 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:reread my post i dont think you are understanding my point
The 03 club did. Do you think the 2012 LSU club will be the same as 2011. Or better yet, is there any comparison whasoever between 2010 LSU and 2011 LSU?
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:06 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
this alabama lsu reference makes zero sense the first game was a hard fought battle that was won on a field goal in over time in which a lot of people still said bama was the better team on the field. auburn got shut out 23-0 irrelevant comparison is irrelevant
USC shutting down Auburn is 2003 is pretty much equal to Alabama shutting down LSU in the National Championship, no? The only difference between the 2 is that Auburn didn't get a chance to show that they were capable of keeping the game close or winning like LSU proved earlier in the season. Well, technically you can't say Auburn had proven that they could keep it close, but their play on the field in 2004 speaks for itself.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:07 pm to Fearthehat0307
I officially give up. Have a good day TT, as a AU fan secondarily (distant but still...) WDE. And of course, 
11/3/12 for order maintenance. 
11/3/12 for order maintenance. Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:08 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Good day, brah. Post more often.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:09 pm to TTsTowel
quote:listen to what i am saying i was furious when auburn got left out. i think they coulda beat usc but comparing a 23-0 1st meeting to a 9-6 overtime slobbernocker is preposterous when wanting a rematch
USC shutting down Auburn is 2003 is pretty much equal to Alabama shutting down LSU in the National Championship, no? The only difference between the 2 is that Auburn didn't get a chance to show that they were capable of keeping the game close or winning like LSU proved earlier in the season. Well, technically you can't say Auburn had proven that they could keep it close, but their play on the field in 2004 speaks for itself.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:11 pm to Fearthehat0307
Jerry Franklin to the Broncos!! 
Broncos are now my team.
Broncos are now my team.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:14 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
i think they coulda beat usc but comparing a 23-0 1st meeting to a 9-6 overtime slobbernocker is preposterous when wanting a rematch
I understand what you're saying. But it wasn't AU fans who brought that rematch up in this thread, it was a dumbass ranter. There's no reason to compare the two games, AU was a completely different team in 04 than 03
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:16 pm to AMM AU9893
quote:someone mentioned that they played the year before but then an aubbie said this
I understand what you're saying. But it wasn't AU fans who brought that rematch up in this thread, it was a dumbass ranter. There's no reason to compare the two games, AU was a completely different team in 04 than 03
quote:
And LSU beat Alabama in the first meeting of 2011...
Posted on 4/28/12 at 8:21 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
i think they coulda beat usc
While I don't think we would've definitely beat them, like you said, we could've gave them a hell of a game...
quote:
but comparing a 23-0 1st meeting to a 9-6 overtime slobbernocker is preposterous when wanting a rematch
I'd agree with this if USC had beaten us soundly in 2004. However, since it wasn't during the same season, and Auburn was a completely different team in 2004, I can't agree.
During 2003, we gave up 16.3 PPG while scoring 26.3 PPG. In 2004, we gave up 11.3 PPG (and had the #1 defense in the nation) while scoring 32.1 PPG. The 2004 team was head and shoulders above the 2003 team. Thank goodness the voters look at SEC team as what they are now, the best in the country. We just dominated the SEC at the wrong time in history (2004).
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:41 pm to BamaNixon
quote:
SEC FUUUUUCKED. STATE OF ALABAMA STAAAAAAACKED.
I dont know why but these posts always make me laugh
And this is a rare thread indeed. I hate Bama winning 2 NCs in the last 3 yrs but, as my wife always reminds me, it is pretty cool that we can say the last 3 came from this state.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:44 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
I'd agree with this if USC had beaten us soundly in 2004. However, since it wasn't during the same season, and Auburn was a completely different team in 2004, I can't agree.
Agree 100%. We were supposed to be the hot team in 03. Dansby and Thomas were wrecking people. Cadillac was supposed to be doin work. We had all the pieces, but, not hte chemistry that year. The 04 team just hit on all cylinders every game it seemed.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 10:47 pm to TTsTowel
quote:you were the one who brought up the comparison between the bama-lsu and usc-aub that is what i am referring to. i agree the comparison is irrelevant as they were from different years but again IT WAS YOU that brought up the comparison, which is what i was arguing against
I'd agree with this if USC had beaten us soundly in 2004. However, since it wasn't during the same season, and Auburn was a completely different team in 2004, I can't agree.
Posted on 4/28/12 at 11:17 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
who cares where they played High School...
Haters care, and you know what they say about that...
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News