Started By
Message

re: Seger or Springsteen

Posted on 5/15/24 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10700 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 12:54 pm to
Springsteen. Seger never had a great album. Bruce had several (Born to Run, Darkness...,The River, Nebraska, Born in the USA). He is a loud mouth tool currently that is tarnishing his legacy with crap new albums but he had a great run. Funny how Rolling Stone keeps propping up Springsteen and U2 because of their politics; their current stuff sucks.
Posted by BabysArmHoldingApple
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2016
870 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Funny how Rolling Stone keeps propping up Springsteen and U2 because of their politics; their current stuff sucks.


I’ve felt for a while that he has gotten more political for just this reason…to stay relevant and in favor with the music press.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
22327 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

He is a loud mouth tool currently that is tarnishing his legacy with crap new albums but he had a great run.


Not al all, despite having his best recorded work behind him (that I agree)... He is still a huge draw because his live shows are still top drawer!
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35629 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Seger never had a great album


Against the Wind and Night Moves are both fantastic albums.
This post was edited on 5/24/24 at 12:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram