Started By
Message

re: Cohen: The payment was delayed in election interference trial, it only matter if Trump won

Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:08 pm to
Posted by ForeverGator
Elite 8 - 2020 Worst SECRant Poster
Member since Nov 2012
13130 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Hopefully Trump's lawyers pick up on the fact this blows the whole case. If Trump said to delay the payment until after the election then it's not election interference.



Please explain.

Payment or no payment, the agreement was entered into prior to the election = election interference.
Posted by RaoulDuke504
Member since Aug 2023
1036 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Please explain. Payment or no payment, the agreement was entered into prior to the election = election interference.


They are trying to prove it was for the election and Trump team is trying to prove it was personal. If it was for the election you would want to shut someone up before people voted not after. Also why would you pay someone to keep quiet if you already won and it would no longer effect the election unless it was because you didn’t want your wife to find out
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram