That’s just not correct at all. Auburn literally has no NIL investment and it’s why Pearl goes after diamonds in the rough for the most part. Broome coming back literally took most of our NIL money in basketball. It’s easy to get top players when you have unlimited NIL like you and other schools do. I mean, Arkansas and UK are getting great portal players, and it has nothing to do with their coaches.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by aspiclark

Member since Jul 2014

3192 posts

Posted on 5/5/24 at 12:42 pm to AUSCgrad2016

so crazy how he explained it to you in detail but you’re still just arrogantly flailing around spewing objectively untrue cope everywhere in post after post. very sad!

you’re having a bad time.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bama3714

Alabama

Member since Feb 2015

5141 posts

Posted on 5/5/24 at 12:46 pm to AUSCgrad2016

quote:
I mean, Arkansas and UK are getting great portal players, and it has nothing to do with their coaches.

Fans... lol. You probably believe players come to your school because of Pearl, though, right?

Because it's what you WANT to believe. Just as you WANT to believe those reasons you posted that Cliff is not a good fit for Bama. So rather than be objective about it and (begrudgingly) admit that the school that is a rival to the one you pull for is doing very well, you mention the things that you WANT to be real (even though they're not).

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TideTurf

Member since Sep 2009

3194 posts

Posted on 5/5/24 at 12:52 pm to AUSCgrad2016

quote:
That’s just not correct at all.

The numbers bear out that Nate Oats has surpassed Bruce Pearl in nearly every category. I don't expect you to realize this because you have been shown numbers in this thread and chosen to ignore them.
An even bigger sign will be, what will Oats do after his Final Four run compared to Pearl. For now on paper Bama looking like a contender.

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board