Started By
Message
re: Games above/below ".500"
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:35 pm to Mason Dixon Swine
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:35 pm to Mason Dixon Swine
quote:
Do you have evidence my maths is wrong?
If a team is 16-0, how many games do you have to go back until they actually were .500?
You say 8 games. But if you do they would then be 8-0.
For a 16-0 team to be at .500, you would have to go back 16 games to when they were 0-0.
Thus the answer is 16, not 8.
I do like this thread. Both grammatical and mathematical errors living together in harmony.
3
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:53 pm to captdalton
I'm not saying what would they have to do in the future to get to .500. I'm talking right now. The present. If 16 games have been played a 500 team will have won 8 games. A 16-0 team is then 8 games above the level of a 500 team (right now).
Posted on 4/29/24 at 5:57 pm to captdalton
"Maths is" is not incorrect grammar, you buffoon.
Posted on 4/30/24 at 3:41 am to captdalton
quote:
For a 16-0 team to be at .500, you would have to go back 16 games to when they were 0-0.
0/0=0.5
Got it
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News