Started By
Message
re: FSU should show up and take a knee until it’s over.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:49 am to paperwasp
Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:49 am to paperwasp
quote:
Nothing about this is intangible.
”Other relevant factors such as…..” shouldn’t be part of decisions like this. That is CRAZY unclear and arbitrary.
Even strength of schedule is a metric at least one degree removed from wins and losses.
The committee following their own bogus rules doesn’t justify it’s own existence.
This post was edited on 12/4/23 at 9:51 am
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:45 am to Dorsal-Fin
quote:The problem is the committee is talking out of both sides of it's arse here...
The committee following their own bogus rules doesn’t justify it’s own existence.
Alabama gets in, because let's acknowledge this: the SEC has won 14 titles since 2000. That's one of the unspoken criteria- the SEC has been the best, so the SEC gets a team in.
*and Bama is the poster-child of SEC dominance.
But going with that reasoning, the ACC has been the 2nd most successful conference, with 3 of the last 10 champs.
The Big 10 has 1 of the last 10, 2 since 2000.
The Big 12 has 2, Texas in 07 and OU at 2000.
The Pac has asterisks. In 2003, USC gets the AP while the LSU wins the BCS; in 2004 they win the BCS but it's voided.
So if you're talking conference strength, the ACC has posed the only viable challenge to the SEC in the past decade, and you're leaving out their undefeated champ.
What makes Washington or Michigan better than them, again? And keep in mind, those are the #1 and #2 seeds.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News