Started By
Message

re: FSU should show up and take a knee until it’s over.

Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:49 am to
Posted by Dorsal-Fin
Arkansas
Member since Jul 2013
381 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Nothing about this is intangible.


”Other relevant factors such as…..” shouldn’t be part of decisions like this. That is CRAZY unclear and arbitrary.

Even strength of schedule is a metric at least one degree removed from wins and losses.

The committee following their own bogus rules doesn’t justify it’s own existence.



This post was edited on 12/4/23 at 9:51 am
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20500 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:45 am to
quote:

The committee following their own bogus rules doesn’t justify it’s own existence.

The problem is the committee is talking out of both sides of it's arse here...

Alabama gets in, because let's acknowledge this: the SEC has won 14 titles since 2000. That's one of the unspoken criteria- the SEC has been the best, so the SEC gets a team in.
*and Bama is the poster-child of SEC dominance.

But going with that reasoning, the ACC has been the 2nd most successful conference, with 3 of the last 10 champs.
The Big 10 has 1 of the last 10, 2 since 2000.
The Big 12 has 2, Texas in 07 and OU at 2000.
The Pac has asterisks. In 2003, USC gets the AP while the LSU wins the BCS; in 2004 they win the BCS but it's voided.

So if you're talking conference strength, the ACC has posed the only viable challenge to the SEC in the past decade, and you're leaving out their undefeated champ.
What makes Washington or Michigan better than them, again? And keep in mind, those are the #1 and #2 seeds.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter