- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Arsenal 2023/24 Season Thread - Rice, Rice, Baby
Posted on 4/10/24 at 3:04 pm to Broyota2
Posted on 4/10/24 at 3:04 pm to Broyota2
He didn’t miss it, he dismissed it based on the spirit of the law. It did not happen defending the goal, gave no advantage to Arsenal, didn’t endanger anyone and had no effect on the game whatsoever. The only punishment for that offense is a penalty. He couldn’t give a goal kick to Bayern or some punishment that fits the offense.
Common sense was used, and you can argue if the referee was correct in doing so. There was a write up comparing this to someone being arrested for jay walking on an empty street. If that was the only punishment someone could give, the officer isn’t going to do it.
Common sense was used, and you can argue if the referee was correct in doing so. There was a write up comparing this to someone being arrested for jay walking on an empty street. If that was the only punishment someone could give, the officer isn’t going to do it.
1
Posted on 4/10/24 at 3:30 pm to JMTIGER85
I mean by rule of law he intentionally touched the ball in the box with his hand, common sense doesn't matter. It should have been a pen and if it was the Prem VAR they would have reviewed it and given it. Would it have been harsh? Yes. You can't say the ref was shite tho because he didn't give the pen on Neur while he doesn't give that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News